Is CAS ruling on UV light blood treatments consistent?
By Dr Ben Koh published on 20 August 2013
It was previously reported in 2012 that Germany’s National Anti-doping agency (NADA) had investigated the use of UV light blood treatment by athletes as potentially a violation of national anti-doping rules1. While the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on 30 January 20122 and the German Sports Arbitration court on 2 Nov 20123 had both deemed that such UV treatments prior to 2011 were not in violation of the anti-doping code, the German NADA disagreed with that position and raised the case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) for clarification.
Do you want to continue reading this article? If so, you will need to sign-up here for instant access.
Access 1000+ peer-reviewed articles written by leading sports lawyers from across the world
For information about corporate and academic institutional membership email email@example.com.
£15 per month
Save 20% with Annual
£146 per year
|Standard Membership(Free)||Plus Membership (£15 per month or £146 per year)|
|Access news updates|
|Access featured articles and interviews with industry leaders|
|Access to three peer-reviewed articles per month|
|Unlimited access to peer-reviewed articles per month|
|Unlimited access to database of 1000+ peer-reviewed articles|
|Find out the latest sports law job vacancies|
|Priority booking to LawInSport Events (conferences, seminars & networking)|
|Exclusive access to LawInSport Seminars|
|15% Discount to LawInSport events such as our annual conference, seminars, masterclasses and networking events|
|20% Discount to the Soccerex Global Convention
|Discounted rate to the British Association for Sport and Law Annual Conference|
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use, professional training and/orclassroom uses is granted free of charge provided that such copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Anti-Doping | ASADA | Australia | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Erythropoietin (EPO) | Germany | National Anti-Doping Agency Germany | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
- What can be done to revive the fight against doping and dopers in sport?
- A tarnished Silver Jubilee: doping in sport 25 years after Johnson and Delgado
- Unheard voices of racism and sexism in sport: Is anti-doping but another “ism” in fairer clothes?
- Anti-doping update from Australia with Paul Horvath
- Anti-doping and medical privacy
About the Author
Dr Ben Koh is the bancassurance Chief Medical Officer leading the medical risk team at one of the world’s largest bank, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. He has clinical and educational training in surgery, sports medicine, emergency medicine and critical care. He was previously an elite swimmer and completed his PhD at the faculty of business, University of Technology Sydney.