Would football benefit from the introduction of a managerial transfer window?

Published 29 July 2013

In this blog Adam Lovatt looks at the possibility of a managerial transfer window being introduced in English football and asks if it is realistic with reference to the current player transfer window.

Paul Ince was the third manager of Blackpool in the 2012-2013 season. Compared with the turnover of managers at other clubs this may seem relatively few, for example Blackburn Rovers. However, Ince has raised an issue which attracted much publicity in the media; should there be a transfer window in place for football managers as there is for players?1

Under current rules, managers are able to move freely between clubs at any time during the year subject to the terms of their contract. This has benefited both managers and clubs to a degree. From a manager's perspective, movement can take place when an manager wants to move when a new opportunity arises. A resignation can be tendered; a manager can end up with a different employer within hours, as happened when Ian Holloway moved from Blackpool to Crystal Palace in November 2012. From a club's perspective, they can remove a manager when results are not going well, as happened at the end of last season when Sunderland removed Martin O'Neill, in order to avoid relegation.

Whilst the League Managers' Association has expressed concern over the number of managerial sackings in the football league in recent times,2 freedom does exist, and arguably should, for managers to move clubs during the course of the season. In no other business do restrictions apply as to when people can move from one job to another. Managers of football teams currently have the same freedom of movement as solicitors or architects. As easy at is for clubs to sack managers when they feel that things are not going the way that they want, managers are able to resign and take up a new challenge when an opportunity arises.

If a managerial transfer window was introduced, there could be numerous benefits:

• Stability for the clubs - if the window was open for the same time for players and managers, clubs would know who a manager would be from September to January and from February to the end of the season.

• Stability for the players- players would know that the manager would not change; allowing them to 'play for the manager'.

• Experimentation - Managers would also be able to experiment, maybe even play more exciting football, in the knowledge that they would not be sacked on a Monday morning following a bad result.

• Respect - It may enchance respect given to managers by players and directors, something that appears to have been diminished of late.

Whilst Ince focused on the potential downsides of managers losing their job, they do have freedom to move between clubs when they desire, to the same extent that clubs can sack managers when they so wish (with consideration to be had for the terms of each contract of employment for the individual manager).

The creation of a managerial window is unlikely to take place any time soon despite the comments which have been made by Paul Ince. Whilst there is uncertainty for managers in terms of them being liable to lose their job at any time, it is unlikely that clubs would allow UEFA and other governing bodies to create a window which would restrict the ability of club owners to remove managers when they wish. As we approach a new season, managers will need to be as wary as ever of trigger happy club owners who want immediate success rather than stability.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21957534

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/385859/LMA-embarrased-by-number-of-manager-sackings-in-the-Football-League

Related Articles

Comments (3)

  • Chris Duffy

    30 July 2013 at 10:02 | #

    Interesting post. I am all for more job security and stability but don't think we should lose sight of the fact that, unlike with players, a team will only have one manager on their books at any one time. They therefore cannot 'bench' a manager if things are not going well so any absolute restriction on hiring a replacement could be massively prejudicial to the club overall - i.e. would Sunderland currently be in the Championship but for their actions last season? I wonder if it would be at all possible to find a happy medium? Possibly drawing on the precedents with regards goalkeepers and emergency loans etc.???

    reply

  • Adam Lovatt

    30 July 2013 at 12:05 | #

    It would be interesting Chris to see how an emergency loan type situation would work. Personally I do not see that as feasible due to the difficulty in defining what an 'emergency' would be. I think in theory the idea of a restriction on when managers could move is a good one. In practice, the policing of of it would be almost impossible.

    reply

  • Matthijs Lambregts

    03 August 2013 at 11:25 | #

    Chris what would be weird about a (second) coach on the bench? Clubs have reserve teams, U23 teams etc, and it is not uncommon that one of these coaches moves up in the event a first team coach is sacked.

    There is one argument not mentioned in the article above and that is a sports argument, i.c. the importance of a fair competition during a season. For that reason most federations do not allow the registration of free players after a certain date in the season. A club whose players fail after such date have no other option than to wait for the next transfer window. When we assume that a coach is part of a team should the fair competition argument than not lead to the same rule (ban) that applies to players?

    reply

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

BASL
Soccerex Core Logo
SLA LOGO 1kpx
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.