AIBA limits Boxing India’s coaches at Games while athlete ruled ineligible due to hyperandrogenismManali Kulkarni
AIBA gives Boxing India an election deadline; Indian boxing coaches' presence ring-side is limited by AIBA
The ban on Indian boxing coaches ruled that “world boxing officials”7 would be with the boxers rather than the four coaches, two of which are Indian chief coach GS Sandhu and Cuban coach Blas Iglesias.8 All the coaches will be seated in the “spectators’ gallery” for all bouts during the CWG.9Rule 16.1.1, AIBA Technical Rules states: “Only AIBA certified Coaches can work as Seconds in all AIBA Competitions”.10
The CWG organizers were notified of this decision on Tuesday, July 15, 2014, after receiving a letter from the Indian Olympic Association (IOA)11. The Indian male boxers were also notified of this decision on Tuesday.12
A member of the ad-hoc BI committee, Rakesh Gupta, explained that he assumed BI officials were not permitted near the ring, but that this did not apply to the boxing coaches themselves.Gupta concluded by stating that IOA president, N Ramachandran, will be requesting the AIBA to withdraw its decision. AIBA has yet to officially respond to this matter.13
The day before this ban was issued, the AIBA announced that it would withdraw BI’s rights as a provisional member if its new constitution is not finalized and elections are not held by August 15, 2014.14 As for long-term effects on the boxers, if BI were to lose its provisional rights then Indian boxers would not be permitted to compete under the Indian flag for the Asian Games in Incheon, South Korea, in September -October 2014.15 The IOA initially created BI to scout for qualified boxers to compete in the Commonwealth Game and Asian Games. Boxing India would become a fully recognized member in the AIBA, governing all of Indian boxing, if BI holds its elections by the August 15 deadline.16 BI has yet to release a statement with a new election schedule.
Jadeja and Anderson both charged under ICC Conduct of Code, no video evidence available
If found guilty, Anderson will face at least a two Tests ban, as his misconduct is considered an ICC Level 3 violation, involving “four suspension points and two equates to missing one Test” at minimum.19 ICC charged Anderson under Article 2.3.3 in the ICC Code of Conduct as a Level 3 violation. 20
Going forward, Article 5.2 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel21requires all Level 3 charges to be heard by an ICC-appointed Judicial Commissioner and for a hearing to be scheduled within 14 days.22
England team manager, Phil Neale, charged Jadeja with a Level 2 offence under the ICC Code of conduct, as a direct consequence of the Indian team charing Anderson with a Level 3 offence.23
Jadeja was charged under Article 2.2.11; ”All Level 2 breaches carry a fine of between 50-100% of the match fee and/or up to two suspension points and come under the match referee's purview. Two suspension points equates to a ban of one Test, or two ODIs”.24
Though the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB)25 has expressed their surprise in the seriousness behind India’s response to such a supposedly minor incidence, India captain, MS Dhoni, however suggested that there was “physical contact”.26 Anderson is “categorically” denying all accusations.27
Due to the conflicting summary of events from Jadeja and Anderson as well as other players who witnessed the conflict, both parties were hoping for video evidence as the deciding factor at the hearing. As of Sunday, July 20, 2014, it was confirmed that video footage is not available.28
A preliminary hearing for Anderson will be conducted via teleconference on Tuesday, July 22, 2014, by ICC-appointed Judicial Commissioner, Gordon Lewis, Australia's representative on the ICC’s Code of Conduct commission, to set the hearing date for Anderson’s charges. 29 Further information on Jadeja’s hearing is not determined yet.30
Indian sprinter suspended due to hyperandrogenism
Chand has voiced that she was not informed that these tests would be conducted and assumed that she was giving blood for a routine check before the Commonwealth Games.36 With the results, Chand will not be competing in Glasgow and has yet to hear directly from the SAI or AFI on the matter. The Indian Olympic Association and the Odisha government have contacted Chand, offering to send two female officers to take her back to her village as well as provide any medical support necessary to counter the high androgen levels so she can compete again.37
According to the the Government of India’s policies on hyperandrogenism38, Chand can appeal this decision within 30 days by requesting a review of her blood tests. Chand has yet to comment on how she plans to proceed.
The State of Odisha, Chand’s home state, will be requesting the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF)38 for the reports39 that resulted in Chand’s suspension in hopes to investigate this matter.40 The IAAF’s regulations on hyperandrogenism can be accessed here.41
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Athletics | Athletics Federation of India (AFI) | Boxing | Boxing India | Commonwealth Games 2014 | Cricket | England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) | Glasgow | India | Indian Olympic Association (IOA) | International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) | International Boxing Association (AIBA) | International Cricket Council (ICC) | Sports Authority of India (SAI)
- AIBA provisionally approve Boxing India, while IOA withhold judgement
- 26 states come together to form Boxing India
- Growing concerns voiced over Boxing India’s temporary approval
- Srinivasan appointed new ICC Chairman as India’s Supreme Court declines to interfere despite IPL investigation
About the Author
Manali is the COO at LawInSport and executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University).