Indian boxer refuses bronze medal at Asian Games, OCA issues warning
By Manali Kulkarni published on 14 October 2014
On October 1, 2014, Indian boxer, Sarita Devi, refused to accept her bronze medal in the 57-60 kg category at the 17th Asian Games Incheon 2014.1, 2 The controversy began after Devi lost her semi-final bout against Park Ji-Na. The judges ruled the fight three rounds to nil in favor of Ji-Na, but Devi claims she dominated the contest and should have won.
Devi protested the decision immediately after the result was declared,3 but the protest proved unsuccessful as, pursuant to Rule 5 of the AIBA Technical Rules (Protest), a boxer cannot appeal the judges’ decision:
“No protest in AOB, APB and WSB Competitions is permitted and the decisions of the Referee & Judges in a Bout are Final.”4
Unable to change the decision, Devi was reportedly distraught during the medal ceremony and would not allow officials to place the medal around her neck. After the ceremony, when Devi went to congratulate Ji-Na for the silver medal, Ji-Na bowed to show her respect in return, and Devi proceeded to place the bronze medal around Ji-Na’s neck.5
As of October 2, Devi has apologized for her behavior and OCA officials have reinstated Devi with the bronze medal.9 OCA has issued a “strong warning” and continues to argue that Devi did not show proper sportsmanship.10
Devi may, however, face an appropriate sanction from AIBA, based on the Disciplinary Commission’s ongoing decision.11 (see update below)
It should be noted that as of October 1, Sports Authority of India (SAI)12 has asked for a report from IOA on Devi’s incident.13 To follow up, India has also asked for a review of the bout between Devi and Ji-Na to be conducted by the OCA’s independent panel.14
AIBA to send Devi’s case to Disciplinary Commission
As reported on October 9, 2014, the AIBA Executive Committee voted to pursue Devi’s case and will not be excusing her actions because of her previously issued apology.15 AIBA will prepare and send the brief on Devi’s incident to the Disciplinary Commission for review. After which, the Disciplinary Commission will make a decision on how to proceed with Devi’s case.
AIBA plans to argue that Devi’s actions at the Asian Games were against the “spirit of fair-play and sportsmanship”16, which serves as grounds for AIBA to impose a sanction on Devi, pursuant to Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the AIBA Disciplinary Code, which state:
“3.1 All persons subject to this Disciplinary Code must:
… (f) respect the principles of honesty, integrity and sportsmanship; and
(g) act in accordance with the principle of fair-play.
3.2 Any failure to respect these general principles of conduct may be sanctioned by the Disciplinary Commission.”17
It seems that the AIBA rules were controversially received at the Asian Games, as reflected by various National Olympic Committees’ (NOCs') reactions to the judges' decisions for boxing.
The Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) is currently facing multiple allegations of preferential treatment at the Asian Games from other NOCs, specifically India, Mongolia, and the Philippines, stating that the boxing judges at the Asian Games were biased towards South Korean boxers.18
Along with the Indian boxer’s incident, the Philippines Olympic Committee (POC)19 have written to the OCA’s organizing committee complaining about two unfair decisions by judges against Filipino boxers, resulting in favor of South Korean boxers.20
- Tags: Asian Games Incheon | Boxing | Governance | India | International Boxing Association (AIBA) | NOC (National Olympic Committee) | Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) | Philippines Olympic Committee (POC) | Regulation | Sports Authority of India (SAI)
- Boxing India provisionally approved by AIBA but status with IOA remains unclear
- The application filed by Tai Cheau Xuen (Malaysia) is dismissed by the CAS
- AFC investigates possible match-fixing at Asian Games and UEFA poised to tackle TPO
- Badminton Association uncover multiple age violations and Boxing India delay elections
About the Author
Manali is the COO at LawInSport and executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University).