Mumbai police find evidence of alleged horseracing doping conspiracyManali Kulkarni
While the police investigation was underway, the steward’s body of the Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC)3 issued a nine-month ban against Shroff, effective March 29, 2014 to December 31, 2014, for being vicariously liable for the incident as the horse’s trainer.4
In March 2014, Shroff appealed his ban5 to the RWITC’s Board of Appeal (BoA), maintaining his innocence and continuing to allege that he has been conspired against.6
The RWITC appointed theAnimal Welfare Board of India (AWBI)7 to investigate the matter. The AWBI finalised its report in May 2014 and its findings are to be considered as fresh evidence. 8 The Board of Appeal then referred this case back to the stewards’ body, who initially imposed this ban.9
Under Article 43 and 44 of the Rules of Racing, the stewards’ body can hear any case referred to them from the BoA on a de novo basis (i.e. afresh) and, if satisfied with the new evidence, can re-open any aspect of the case.10 Shroff now awaits a decision regarding his nine-month ban.
As of August 2014, the results from the four-month long investigation conducted by the Mumbai crime branch11 on Shroff’s initial police report concluded that there are may be valid grounds for Shroff’s conspiracy allegations.12
The Mumbai crime branch’s findings resulted in four employees of a Maval-based stud farm, where Shroff trained Bullseye, being arrested on August 8, 2014.13
In addition, Shroff’s main competition, experienced trainer, Kawasji “Cooji” Katrak, was also questioned twice. The Mumbai crime branch’s statements to date hint that Katrak may have known details about the possible conspiracy.14
It appears that the Mumbai crime branch has phone conversations in their possession hinting at a planned conspiracy. One of the conversations involves a RWITC official, discussing plans to contact the four employees who were arrested, hoping that they would provide affidavits confirming the doping charge to the RWITC, and supposedly framing Shroff as guilty.15
The investigations relating to Shroff’s police report and decisions on his appeal are still underway.
Shroff is a known name in Indian turf racing, training the most horses and being one of the highest paid trainers on the circuit.16 As a rider, he also won the Indian Derby 8 times and the Indian Turf Invitation 7 times.17
Last week, the RWITC stated that it plans to revisit the vicarious liability rule under which Shroff was initially banned. There are no further details on potential amendments to the regulations.18
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Criminal Law | Horseracing | Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC) | Royal Western Indian Turf Club Rule of Racing
- India - Scheduling conflict for badminton league, boxing in turmoil and IPL 2014 corruption crackdown
- Srinivasan appointed new ICC Chairman as India’s Supreme Court declines to interfere despite IPL investigation
- Rajasthan Cricket Association prepared to take legal action against BCCI
- How the Anderson/Jadeja ruling puts Cricket and ICC’s Code of Conduct under spotlight
About the Author
Manali is the COO at LawInSport and executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University).