A Marathon, Not a Sprint: NCAA Concussion Settlement Revised Again

Published 27 May 2016 | Authored by: Joseph M. Hanna

A long awaited settlement for NCAA concussion litigation has been revised, once again. The NCAA released the proposal in an effort to address shortfalls in previous settlement plans.1

The revised settlement, if approved by the court, provides injured student-athletes the option to sue their individual colleges, but only on behalf of players of a single sport. Additionally, the proposal removes a provision that would allow the administrator handling medical monitoring claims to pursue reimbursement from former athletes’ private insurers. The NCAA and lead plaintiffs agreed to the proposed settlement on Friday, May 20, 2016.

The previous iteration of the settlement,2 released on January 26, 2016, received preliminary approval by U.S. District Judge John Z. Lee. At that time, the NCAA offered a $75 million settlement for current and former student-athletes. Judge Lee, however, modified the settlement, subject to NCAA approval, proposing that the NCAA and member schools are not safe from personal injury claims brought against an individual school. Further, the court suggested additional publicity3 would be necessary to promote the availability of concussion monitoring programs. The NCAA had to approve the modifications.

The settlement revisions are an attempt to remedy concerns identified by Judge Lee at the time he granted preliminary approval of the January settlement proposal. The court’s main concern was that the settlement was too broad, preventing valid personal injury claims from being litigated. Although the new settlement provides venues for injured athletes to make claims outside of the settlement, the NCAA limited suits to players of a single sport. According to the NCAA, “A bodily injury class consisting of student-athletes who played multiple sports at a single member school would be too broad.

The modifications are the only revisions to the settlement. The previously approved $75 million4 was resubmitted with the proposal. Under the terms, the NCAA agrees to contribute $70 million toward a medical monitoring fund for current and former student-athlete neurological screening. The neurological screenings are intended to examine brain functions and brain damage. An additional $5 million will be set aside for concussion related research.

The revised settlement came after former San Diego State football player Anthony Nichols5 dropped his opposition to the settlement. Nichols objected to previous settlements because it did not provide any monetary remedy for athletes injured while playing. Objectors remain fearful that the $75 million will benefit future athletes, leaving current and former athletes to pay for medical treatment of concussion-related injuries. The class wants the NCAA to pay for medical treatment.

The settlement revisions require approval from Judge Lee.


Related Articles

About the Author

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph Hanna is a partner of Goldberg Segalla and concentrates his practice in commercial litigation with a focus on sports and entertainment law and retail, hospitality, and development litigation. Joe represents sports franchises, professional athletes, and movie studios with various issues related to licensing, contracts, and day-to-day management. He serves as Chair of Goldberg Segalla’s Sports and Entertainment Law Practice Group and editor of the firm’s Sports and Entertainment Law Insider blog. In addition, Joe is the Chair of Goldberg Segalla's Diversity Task Force. He possesses an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

Soccerex Core Logo
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.