Florida law professor requests argument before court on sports betting

By Joseph M. Hanna published on 30 October 2017

October 26 2017

On October 17, 2017, Florida State University professor Ryan Rodenberg asked the U.S. Supreme Court in an amicus brief to consider all of its options before ruling on a challenge to a federal sports betting ban. Rodenberg, whose research is in sports law analytics, requested the court to grant him five minutes in oral arguments to argue that the court should rule based on the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) without ruling on the law’s constitutionality.

Rodenberg’s amicus brief is his latest contribution in which he previously backed New Jersey and a thoroughbred horse owners and trainers group that requested the Supreme Court to review whether New Jersey can selectively repeal its anti-sports betting laws concerning casinos and horse race tracks without violating PASPA. Then, in July, Rodenberg argued that the lower courts went beyond the text of the statute when they stopped all sports betting. In September, Rodenberg filed another brief that argued upholding the appellate decision would empower any single league to stop sports betting even if other leagues decide to support it.

The October brief was filed one day after the NCAA, NBA, NHL, and MLB argued that PASPA does not force states to enact or administer federal policy. Rodenberg argued that the unusual nature of the case showed how important it was to present all potential judicial options, not just the constitutional claims. He also argued his involvement would help the court continue tradition of avoiding reaching constitutional questions before it is necessary to decide them. In addition, Rodenberg stated that the, “constitutional claims are complex, shifting and sometimes paradoxical. But the court need not disentangle the Gordian knot that is PASPA’s Tenth Amendment anti-commandeering implications.” With the filing of the amicus brief, Rodenberg continues his active involvement in the case.



Related Articles

About the Author

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph Hanna is a partner of Goldberg Segalla and concentrates his practice in commercial litigation with a focus on sports and entertainment law and retail, hospitality, and development litigation. Joe represents sports franchises, professional athletes, and movie studios with various issues related to licensing, contracts, and day-to-day management. He serves as Chair of Goldberg Segalla’s Sports and Entertainment Law Practice Group and editor of the firm’s Sports and Entertainment Law Insider blog. In addition, Joe is the Chair of Goldberg Segalla's Diversity Task Force. He possesses an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

Soccerex Core Logo
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.