Mumbai police find evidence of alleged horseracing doping conspiracy
While the police investigation was underway, the steward’s body of the Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC)3 issued a nine-month ban against Shroff, effective March 29, 2014 to December 31, 2014, for being vicariously liable for the incident as the horse’s trainer.4
In March 2014, Shroff appealed his ban5 to the RWITC’s Board of Appeal (BoA), maintaining his innocence and continuing to allege that he has been conspired against.6
The RWITC appointed theAnimal Welfare Board of India (AWBI)7 to investigate the matter. The AWBI finalised its report in May 2014 and its findings are to be considered as fresh evidence. 8 The Board of Appeal then referred this case back to the stewards’ body, who initially imposed this ban.9
Under Article 43 and 44 of the Rules of Racing, the stewards’ body can hear any case referred to them from the BoA on a de novo basis (i.e. afresh) and, if satisfied with the new evidence, can re-open any aspect of the case.10 Shroff now awaits a decision regarding his nine-month ban.
As of August 2014, the results from the four-month long investigation conducted by the Mumbai crime branch11 on Shroff’s initial police report concluded that there are may be valid grounds for Shroff’s conspiracy allegations.12
The Mumbai crime branch’s findings resulted in four employees of a Maval-based stud farm, where Shroff trained Bullseye, being arrested on August 8, 2014.13
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Criminal Law | Horseracing | Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC) | Royal Western Indian Turf Club Rule of Racing
- India - Scheduling conflict for badminton league, boxing in turmoil and IPL 2014 corruption crackdown
- Srinivasan appointed new ICC Chairman as India’s Supreme Court declines to interfere despite IPL investigation
- How the Anderson/Jadeja ruling puts Cricket and ICC’s Code of Conduct under spotlight
- Rajasthan Cricket Association prepared to take legal action against BCCI
About the Author
Manali is currently a third year (3L) JD Candidate at the University of Maine School of Law. She was the COO at LawInSport and continues to be an executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University). She is currently the legal extern for the Professional Collegiate League, and also serves as an intern for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Manali previously researched on sports and society in India, specifically focusing on the influence of sport on the gender divide in India. She joined LawInSport in September 2013 as a research assistant providing updates on Indian sports law.