Match-fixing and the potential ‘Matuzalem effect’
Regular readers of my sports law blog will be aware of my strong feelings about the sanctions handed down to those found guilty of integrity offences, particularly for match-fixing.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | Football | Integrity | Match-Fixing | Swiss Federal Supreme Court (FSC) | Switzerland | UEFA | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
Related Articles
- Should we be comfortably satisfied with the standard of proof for match-fixing?
- Match-fixing and the rights of individual sports participants: The Stephen Lee appeal
- Spain: First steps for coordinating measures against match fixing
- Summit held at IOC headquarters to discuss the fight against doping, match-fixing, illegal betting and good governance in the Olympic movement
Written by
Kevin Carpenter
Kevin is a advisor and member of the editorial board for LawInSport, having previously acted as editor. In his day-to-day work he has two roles: as the Principal for his own consultancy business Captivate Legal & Sports Solutions, and Special Counsel for Sports Integrity at leading global sports technology and data company Genius Sports.
Football Law In Practice Course - Live