Should we be comfortably satisfied with the standard of proof for match-fixing?
In this blog I have previously discussed the sanctions for match-fixing offences. I now intend to put the horse back before the cart and briefly examine another aspect of match-fixing cases, the standard of proof.
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | cricket | match-fixing | snooker | UEFA | United Kingdom (UK)
- Match fixing in Bangladesh: the ICC’s biggest investigation yet
- Hill Dickinson gives expert advice on match-fixing at Scottish PFA’s National Conference
- BASL September update: sporting integrity revisited
- Realities of football match-fixing – case Finland
About the Author
Kevin is a advisor and member of the editorial board for LawInSport, having previously acted as editor. In his day-to-day work he has two roles: as the Principal for his own consultancy business Captivate Legal & Sports Solutions, and Special Counsel for Sports Integrity at leading global sports technology and data company Genius Sports.