Caterham redundancies and the unlikely connection between employment and libel law

The statement by the Affected Staff
Caterham’s response
- the claim that the staff had been released by the Caterham F1 team, as opposed to a different entity, which is said to employ the staff; and
- the claim that the staff were not paid in July.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Defamation | Employment Law | Formula 1 | Libel | Motorsport | United Kingdom (UK)
Related Articles
- Contractual remedies for damage to reputation in sport sponsorship
- Makudi v Triesman: Comments on FIFA's ethics leads to questions over the protection offered by the Bill of Rights
- European rugby law update - ticket touting and defamation claim
- Why did Coventry City FC’s State aid claim fail?
Written by
Nicholas Goodfellow
Nick specialises in commercial and employment litigation. Nick is a keen sportsman, and has acted in a variety of sports related disputes. Nick has acted for a racehorse trainer claiming unpaid fees and defending allegations of professional negligence, and for a senior executive of a leading football club.