David Moyes’ sacking - legal rights and options
David Moyes has been sacked after just 51 games as manager of Manchester United. Remarkably the last occasion United sacked their manager was 28-years previously, when Ron Atkinson was removed in 1986. In this article John Mehrzad sets out, from a legal perspective, what will happen next for Moyes.
Remarkably the last occasion United sacked their manager was 28-years previously, when Ron Atkinson was removed in 1986. Although Big Ron’s replacement, Alex Ferguson, did not win a trophy for 4 years (and was reportedly one loss away from being sacked himself in early 1990) what he then went on to achieve at the club is now the stuff of legend. This short article does not propose to hark back to United’s glory-days but rather, from a legal perspective, set out what will happen next for Moyes.
The fixed-term contract regime
Moyes signed a 6-year fixed-term manager contract last July.1 Within a fixed-term contract regime, unless there is a clear and unambiguous notice clause2 or an agreed termination payment clause, the employee is entitled to payment of his salary and benefits for the remaining period of his contract, albeit subject to the principles of mitigation depending on the wording of the contract. This is best exemplified by Henning Berg3 walking away from Blackburn Rovers last year with the entire value of the remainder of his contract, namely £2.25 million, after only 57-days in charge.4 However, when Kevin Keegan resigned as Newcastle manager he was unsuccessful in a claim for £20 million as there was a clear contractual termination clause setting out an agreed sum of £2 million to be paid in such a situation.5
For Moyes the contractual situation appears clear-cut. According to reports in The Times6 his contract contains a 12-month termination payment clause, which apparently equates to a pay-off of £4.5 million. The nuance to this case is, though, reports of a contractual performance “break-clause”7, which entitled United to terminate if Champions League qualification was not secured and limited compensation to one-year only in that circumstance. That Moyes was sacked shortly after that threshold was not reached leads a degree of credence to such a clause existing in practice. If so, such a performance related clause may be followed by other clubs in the future, thereby limiting compensation payable to failing managers. Such clauses may see the end of enormous compensation payments for managers instead reducing them to fixed amounts if key objectives, such as European qualification, winning a trophy or promotion, are not achieved or, say, the club is relegated.
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Under-Performing Managers: Give Them Extra Time Or Send Them For An Early Bath?
- Henning Berg v Blackburn Rovers
- The football managerial merry-go-round: employing former players & backroom staff: part 1
- Would football benefit from the introduction of a managerial transfer window?
- Malky Mackay and manager termination rights: What options does he have?
- Image rights companies in football – where are we now?
- The barriers to state intervention into football governance
John Mehrzad QC was appointed Silk after only 13 years’ practice – the fastest appointee in the 2019 competition. With a background in employment law and commercial law, his sports law at Littleton Chambers, London, practice focuses, on the one hand, on financial disputes between clubs, managers, players, intermediaries, associations and commercial partners – usually before FA, PL or EFL arbitrations, or before FIFA or the CAS.