MLB seeks pre-trial appeal & plaintiffs seek class certification in anti-trust broadcasting litigation
On Wednesday August 27, 2014, the MLB1 filed a motion for immediate interlocutory appeal2 with Judge Scheindlin in the Southern District of New York, seeking permission to appeal her recent order3 in their current antitrust litigation case.
The MLB’s geographically based broadcasting restrictions are currently being challenged in the SDNY by irate fans who are tired of blackout restrictions and the high prices of streaming games online. Earlier this month, Judge Scheindlin ruled against the MLB’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the oft-cited antitrust exemption did not apply to the MLB, allowing the claims to go forward to trial.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Baseball | Broadcasting | Competition Law | Major League Baseball (MLB) | National Hockey League (NHL) | Supreme Court | United States of America (USA)
- International transfer disputes in ice hockey - Part 3: a three-part solution
- PCC awards $2.3M in grant funds to support anti-doping science
- Cleveland Indians Logo Under Attack
- A-Rod’s PED Supplier Surrendered to DEA as MLB doping case continues