Video of Sports Law Conference 2016 - The future of the 'legal autonomy' of sport - Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, 18 September 2016. Hosted by Tom Serby.
The theme of the conference is “the legal autonomy of sport”, a concept long treasured by sports governing bodies, but which is perceived by some now to be a cloak for lack of democracy and fair process. Within this overall theme there are three strands reflecting the three conference sessions: contractual, political and legal autonomy.
The word autonomy derives from the Greek words auto and nomos, and means “those who make their own law”. This raises obvious questions regarding legitimacy, more so in the light of 2015/16 being global sport’s annus horribilis, when sport was on the front pages for the wrong reasons, involving the continuing aftermath of corruption scandals relating to match-fixing and doping, a situation directly related it would seem to inadequate governance of several major international sports. At the same time disquiet has been voiced about whether the sports world’s system of private arbitration affords athletes fair recourse to their rights.
This second session (of three) looks at whether sports governing bodies can on their own act to rid sport of corruption without enlisting support from governmental and intergovernmental actors.
- Professor Jack Anderson - Queens University Belfast
- Tom Serby - Anglia Ruskin University
- John O'Leary - Anglia Ruskin University
- Dr Leonardo Valladares Pacheco de Oliveira - Anglia Ruskin University
Session 1 looks at the contractual autonomy of sport and is available here.
Session 3 looks at the legal autonomy of sport and is available here.
- Tags: Anti-Doping - Arbitration - Autonomy - Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) - European Union - FIFA - International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) - Pechstein - Sports Governing Bodies - UEFA - United Kingdom (UK)