Boxing India’s elections go ahead despite concerns from IOA
Published 12 September 2014 By: Manali Kulkarni
Boxing India (BI)1, India’s provisional member of International Boxing Association (AIBA)2 tasked with governing the country’s boxing, held formal elections yesterday (11 September) in the hope Indian boxers will compete under BI in the upcoming 17th Asian Games Incheon 2014.
Boxing India has recently faced multiple allegations related to the motives and transparency of the elections, which led the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) to write to the AIBA requesting that the IOA hold the elections.
This Indian sports law update centers around the allegations against BI, the IOA’s and the AIBA’s consequent actions, and the election results.
Boxing India’s rocky background
To recount events, on 1 April, BI’s predecessor, the Indian Amateur Boxing Federation, was derecognized by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports’ (Sports Ministry)3 for failing to comply with directives from them and the AIBA.
On April 2, the IOA created an ad hoc panel4 as a temporary arrangement to govern Indian boxing and allow fighters to continue competing internationally.
BI then formed as a proposed full time replacement, and were recognised by the AIBA as a provisional member for India, and given the right to participate in AIBA-approved Confederation and National events (as set out in Article 12.2 of the AIBA Statues).5 The IOA, however, withheld their judgement on BI.6
AIBA required BI to quickly conduct full elections and revamp their constitution, or have their provisional status withdrawn. Pursuant to Article 13(E)7 of the AIBA Statutes and Article 34 in the AIBA ByLaws,8 BI must submit the results of any election and appointment of their officers to AIBA for approval.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Asian Games Incheon | Boxing | Boxing India | India | Indian Amateur boxing Federation (IABF) | Indian Olympic Association (IOA) | International Boxing Association (AIBA) | IOC | Olympic Council of Asia (OCA)
- Boxing India provisionally suspends Gujarat State Amateur Boxing Association
- Badminton Association uncover multiple age violations and Boxing India delay elections
- AIBA limits Boxing India’s coaches at Games while athlete ruled ineligible due to hyperandrogenism
- 26 states come together to form Boxing India
- Growing concerns voiced over Boxing India’s temporary approval
- AIBA provisionally approve Boxing India, while IOA withhold judgement
Manali is currently a second year (2L) JD Candidate at the University of Maine School of Law. She was previously the COO at LawInSport and continues to be an executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University). During the fall of her second year in Portland, Maine, Manali also had the opportunity to be the legal intern at Global Sports Advocates.
Manali previously researched on sports and society in India, specifically focusing on the influence of sport on the gender divide in India. She joined LawInSport in September 2013 as a research assistant providing updates on Indian sports law. She is currently back in her hometown, Memphis, Tennessee, for a visiting semester at the University of Memphis School of Law.