How India’s demonetization is impacting Indian sport
On November 8th, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered a surprise address to the country at large. In his address, he announced demonetization as a measure to curb the plague of black money.1 As a corollary to his actions to bring more accountability, he announced that currency of the denominations of Rupee (R.) 500 (approx. USD $7.5) and R. 1000 (approx. $14.5) would cease to be legal tender from midnight of 8th November 2016. This resulted in a whopping 86.4 percent of the currency notes in circulation in India being declared as defunct.2
What ensued was nothing less than pandemonium. Chaos reigned supreme as banks and Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) saw long snaking queues of citizens, anxious to exchange the now-defunct notes.3 The Government put a number of provisions and restrictions in place to ease the transition the process of exchange of old and defunct currency to the newly announced denominations,4 but these offered little respite.
As per estimates available online, currency amounting to Rs.14 trillion was pulled out of circulation. If the Government plans to replace this deficit with the new notes in an equal ratio (half the amount in Rs.2000 notes, and the other half in the new Rs.500 notes), it has been calculated that it will take 175 days to print the number of notes required and then transfer and distribute them.
While the intention behind this drastic measure may be laudable, the implementation has left a lot to be desired. Acute shortage of the new denomination notes, coupled with ATMs that required recalibration, brought a significant portion of cash transactions to a standstill. People were left in the lurch, with no option but to either deposit their money in banks, or get the money exchanged from banks.
Though a section of people welcomed the move and undertook to brave the inconvenience caused, a section of the populace was up in arms against the decision of the Government. Deaths of patrons, caused while waiting at queues in banks was used as ammunition to assail the viability of this decision. The Government, however, ruled out withdrawal or roll-back of this move.5
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) | Contract | Cricket | Employment | England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) | Governance | India | Regulation
- The need for better dispute resolution systems in Indian sport and the Government’s new Guidelines
- The future of sports governance: Will sport sustain its traditional model of autonomy?
- IPL media rights bidding structure, Yadav investigation and DRS in Indian cricket
- How sports rights holders protect against IP infringements in India: Part 1 - overview of IP laws
Founder, AM Sports Law & Management Co
Ms. Aahna Mehrotra is the principal lawyer at AM Sports Law and Management Co. She was called to the Bar in May 2011 and has gained considerable exposure through her experiences at different institutions worldwide.