Mumbai police find evidence of alleged horseracing doping conspiracy
Published 23 August 2014 By: Manali Kulkarni
While the police investigation was underway, the steward’s body of the Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC)3 issued a nine-month ban against Shroff, effective March 29, 2014 to December 31, 2014, for being vicariously liable for the incident as the horse’s trainer.4
In March 2014, Shroff appealed his ban5 to the RWITC’s Board of Appeal (BoA), maintaining his innocence and continuing to allege that he has been conspired against.6
The RWITC appointed theAnimal Welfare Board of India (AWBI)7 to investigate the matter. The AWBI finalised its report in May 2014 and its findings are to be considered as fresh evidence. 8 The Board of Appeal then referred this case back to the stewards’ body, who initially imposed this ban.9
Under Article 43 and 44 of the Rules of Racing, the stewards’ body can hear any case referred to them from the BoA on a de novo basis (i.e. afresh) and, if satisfied with the new evidence, can re-open any aspect of the case.10 Shroff now awaits a decision regarding his nine-month ban.
As of August 2014, the results from the four-month long investigation conducted by the Mumbai crime branch11 on Shroff’s initial police report concluded that there are may be valid grounds for Shroff’s conspiracy allegations.12
The Mumbai crime branch’s findings resulted in four employees of a Maval-based stud farm, where Shroff trained Bullseye, being arrested on August 8, 2014.13
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Criminal Law | Horseracing | Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC) | Royal Western Indian Turf Club Rule of Racing
- India - Scheduling conflict for badminton league, boxing in turmoil and IPL 2014 corruption crackdown
- Srinivasan appointed new ICC Chairman as India’s Supreme Court declines to interfere despite IPL investigation
- Rajasthan Cricket Association prepared to take legal action against BCCI
- How the Anderson/Jadeja ruling puts Cricket and ICC’s Code of Conduct under spotlight
Manali is currently a second year (2L) JD Candidate at the University of Maine School of Law. She was previously the COO at LawInSport and continues to be an executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University). During the fall of her second year in Portland, Maine, Manali also had the opportunity to be the legal intern at Global Sports Advocates.
Manali previously researched on sports and society in India, specifically focusing on the influence of sport on the gender divide in India. She joined LawInSport in September 2013 as a research assistant providing updates on Indian sports law. She is currently back in her hometown, Memphis, Tennessee, for a visiting semester at the University of Memphis School of Law.