Paralympic Committee of India’s Code of Conduct consists of “unethical clauses”
Published 23 October 2014 By: Manali Kulkarni
As of October 17, 2014, Indian paralympic athletes voiced that they were required to sign a new Code of Conduct (the Code) issued by the Paralympic Committee of India (PCI)1 that consisted of “unethical clauses”.2 In that, the Code of Conduct allows for searching the athletes’ belongings, and introduced HIV testing requirements.3
87 athletes report that they signed the Code because they were told that they would be excluded from the ongoing Asian Para Games (October 18- 24, 2014) in Incheon otherwise. The athletes also explained that if they did not agree to the HIV testing, they would face a loss of accreditation and future exclusion.4
The paralympians who have argued against the clauses in the Code have chosen to remain anonymous, as the Code reportedly states that any athletes who reports to the media may face a life ban.5
The PCI explained that this confidentiality requirement not included as a way to limit freedom.6 The PCI officials have additionally argued that this Code was meant to address the indiscipline seen in the Indian athletes in the past, as random searches would arguable allow the PCI officials to act against doping and related offences.7
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | Asian Para Games | Ethics | India | International Paralympic Committee (IPC) | Paralympic Committee of India (PCI) | Paralympics
- IOC grants provisional recognition to Kosovo Olympic Committee
- Last quarter of CCES activities focuses on Pre-Olympic and Paralympic athlete preparation
- New match-fixing investigations in cricket, badminton and football
- ASADA responds to AFL Players’ Association’s demands
Manali is currently a second year (2L) JD Candidate at the University of Maine School of Law. She was previously the COO at LawInSport and continues to be an executive contributor of the editorial board for LawInSport. She holds an LLM in Sports Law from Nottingham Law School (Nottingham Trent University). During the fall of her second year in Portland, Maine, Manali also had the opportunity to be the legal intern at Global Sports Advocates.
Manali previously researched on sports and society in India, specifically focusing on the influence of sport on the gender divide in India. She joined LawInSport in September 2013 as a research assistant providing updates on Indian sports law. She is currently back in her hometown, Memphis, Tennessee, for a visiting semester at the University of Memphis School of Law.