Global match-fixing: J-League launch investigation, CONCACAF's new Competition Integrity Measures, and Australia propose new legislation
Published 25 March 2014
This week's recap features a number of articles related to match-fixing in sports besides football including cricket, rugby and e-sports. This further proves that match-fixing and corruption in sport is a global problem, requiring the coordinated efforts of all stakeholders from sport, law enforcement, government and the gaming sector to effectively combat.
Japan's professional football league has said an internal probe turned up no evidence to support suspicions that a recent match was fixed, as it wrestles with an embarrassing racism scandal. The J-League launched an investigation earlier this month after a FIFA unit said it had noticed unusual online betting patterns in a March 8 game between Sanfrecce Hiroshima and Kawasaki Frontale. Betting on football is legal in Japan. But FIFA's Early Warning System, launched in 2007 to fight corruption in world football, spotted an abnormal rise in bets that Kawasaki would lead the match at half-time, with its rival prevailing by the final whistle. That turned out to be a profitable bet: Sanfrecce overcame a 1-0 half-time deficit to beat Kawasaki 2-1. After questioning players, coaches, officials, referees and other people involved in the match, the league said in a statement on its website Tuesday that there was "no trace at all" of match-fixing.
Source: "Japan football's J-League denies match-fixing", 19 March 2014, AFP https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/world/a/22061193/japan-footballs-j-league-denies-match-fixing/
Korea (Rep. of)
The Korea eSports Association have finished their investigation into the testimony of professional League of Legends player Promise, who attempted suicide last week after revealing the extent of match fixing within AHQ Korea. After examining replays and audio files from Ongamenet and speaking to Promise’s former teammates, KeSPA have reported that his account of player coercion was mostly accurate - and will file a lawsuit against AHQ’s coach. In spring 2013, AHQ Korea coach Mr Noh gathered his players together. The team had advanced to the round of 16 stage of OGN Champions, one of South Korea’s most prestigious tournaments. Mr Noh, it is alleged, told his team that OGN had a tradition of taking an ‘advertisement fee’ from large qualifying eSports companies like AHQ. Noh said that, amid some language difficulties, he had refused to pay - and as a result, OGN were demanding that AHQ must throw their games against certain other Champions teams. AHQ weren’t convinced. But according to KeSPA’s report, two of its players - Promise and ActScene - later agreed in private to help fix two upcoming matches against KTB and CJ Frost. They would do so in exchange for some of the money Noh said he had received from OGN. Player testimony has led KeSPA to conclude that only Promise took part in the match fixing. The organisation are in the process of filing a lawsuit against Mr Noh, and plan to use the details of their report as evidence in a case against him.
Source: Jeremy Peel, "KeSPA confirm AHQ League of Legends team were coerced into match fixing by coach", 19 March 2014, PCGamesN https://www.pcgamesn.com/kespa-confirm-ahq-league-legends-team-were-coerced-match-fixing-coach
Former KL player Hafizi Roslee, who was banned for life by the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) for his alleged involvement in match-fixing, will have his civil dispute heard at the High Court next month. Judicial Commissioner Rosilah Yop set April 23 to hear the matter. Speaking to reporters yesterday, Hafizi’s lawyer Kevin De Rozario said his client was suing FAM not for damages but to get a court order to declare that the disciplinary codes were unfair. He said JC Rosilah ordered the parties to file their affidavits by March 31 and hand over the respective written submissions by April 17. In the lawsuit filed on Feb 26, the 29-year-old former defender has named FAM and Kuala Lumpur Football Association as defendants. Hafizi is seeking a declaration that he is not bound by an FAM notice dated Dec 4 last year and that disciplinary proceedings conducted by it without his presence on Dec 20 last year was to be struck off and rendered invalid. He wants to get a declaration that the court has the jurisdiction based on equity and natural justice to quash or strike out Articles under the FAM’s disciplinary code which was unconstitutional.
Source: "Ex-footballer has April 23 hearing against FAM", 18 March 2014, The Star Online https://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014/03/18/Exfootballer-has-April-23-hearing-against-FAM/
CONCACAF has introduced a set of Competition Integrity Measures to tackle match-fixing. They are now being conducted before every CONCACAF tournament and competition. Titled 'Protect Yourself and Keep Your Sport Clean' the programme debuted at this year's CONCACAF Women's Under-20 Championship in the Cayman Islands and is currently being implemented in the CONCACAF Champions League. The measures have also been adopted by the Caribbean Football Union for its competitions. The educational programme is primarily based on prevention of match fixing but carries information on how to report incidents and details of contact officials on-site. The educational programme reinforces the regulations which outlaw betting on football matches by players and officials, and emphasises that the communication of sensitive inside information to anyone outside the club is forbidden.
Source: Paul Nicholson, "CONCACAF battles match-fixers with new protocol and educational programme", 17 March 2014, Inside World Football https://www.insideworldfootball.com/world-football/football-americas/concacaf-news/14301-concacaf-battles-match-fixers-with-new-protocol-and- educational-programme
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Africa | Anti-Corruption | Australia | China | CONCACAF | FIFA | FIFPro | Germany | Governance | India | INTERPOL | Japan | Malaysia | Match-Fixing | South Korea | Spain | United Kingdom (UK) | United States of America (USA)
- Interpol's Integrity In Sport weekly media recap - 10-16 March 2014
- Can you fix the World Cup Final? Contrasting perspectives on match fixing in football
- A kick in the assets: How UK authorities can recover the profits of match fixing
- Kent cricketer cleared of failing to report match-fixing: ICC charging policy must be scrutinised