European Football Sports Law News 25 Feb 2014
EURO 2016 Draw
One intriguing aspect of the Euro 2016 qualifying draw held in Nice on Sunday was the announcement prior to the draw commencing that neither Spain and Gibraltar or Armenia and Azerbaijan could be placed in the same group due to political tensions between the respective countries.
This was announced by UEFA prior to the draw taking place. As is so often the case and has been highlighted in a previous blog, politics and sport often clash and politics is the ultimate winner.
As luck would have it, Group C was where Spain was placed in the draw from Pot 1, with Gibraltar following from Pot 6 (which was drawn immediately after Pot 1). As a result, the newest and smallest full member of UEFA by population was immediately moved to Group D in order to avoid the current European Champions. Whilst moving countries ranked so differently in Europe is not problematic and does not seemingly place other countries at a disadvantage (in this case Gibraltar got Germany rather than Spain and ended up with Luxembourg from Pot 6) it does set a rather dangerous precedent.
Whilst Gibraltar are not expected to perform particularly well during the qualification campaign, the inability of members of UEFA to play against each other in competitive matches does raise some real issues. What would happen if England and Spain were to find themselves at war or face 'sensitivities' regarding the sovereignty of Gibraltar? Would they have to be kept apart in qualifying campaigns? And what would happen in the final European Championship or World Cup tournament itself in such a situation?
Whilst UEFA were following political influence in respect of the draw on Sunday, there are real competition issues raised by such a protocol being in place.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- European Football Sports Law News 19 Feb 2014
- European Football Sports Law News 10 Feb 2014
- European sports rights - interview with Benoît Keane
- EU Employment Law an obstacle to footballers' calls for quota system in England
Adam is a lawyer specialising in sports law with IMG. Adam has a wide range of commercial and litigation experience from his four years as a qualified solicitor. Adam has a passion for sports law and is currently undertaking a IP Law Masters programme with the University of London. He is passionate about most sports particularly football, golf and tennis.
Thomas is a Solicitor in Kerman & Co’s sports team. Thomas is predominantly a commercial contracts lawyer who advises the team’s biggest sporting clients and major event organisers on a range of their commercial issues, including working in-house at The All England Lawn Tennis Club, Wimbledon. His experience includes advising on data and consumer protection, IT/software development and procurement contracts.