Social media and reputation management - what’s over the marksman’s line?
Published 29 April 2013 By: Laura Scaife
In the first two parts of this blog we have explored the right to be offensive and the right to be offenses, however it is difficult to know where banter ands and criminal liability begins.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Is there a right to be offensive?
- Brand reputation: what can Joey Barton teach sports stars about dealing with offensive tweets?
- Don’t be cagy with your Tweets: FTC guidance on paid promotions
Laura is an innovative thinker in the field of Social Media and has been extensively published on matters concerning compliance with e-commerce issues arising out of the Office of Fair Trading and Advertising Standard Agency guidelines as well as online revenue generation, defamation, electronic communications based offences, effective dispute settlement, business crisis management and reputational management.