A tarnished Silver Jubilee: doping in sport 25 years after Johnson and Delgado
Published 14 August 2013
The current anti-doping regime in sport is open to criticism. The necessity for ever more sensitive testing means that laboratory costs are escalating and draining the resources of sport. The application of the World Anti-Doping Code by certain national anti-doping agencies is patchy and thus, although the drug and supplement intake of athletes in some countries is strictly regulated; others are, in effect, self-regulating (and self-medicating).
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Unheard voices of racism and sexism in sport: Is anti-doping but another “ism” in fairer clothes?
- 20-month sports ban for athlete Jarrod Bannister
- US weightlifting athlete, Wilhelm, accepts sanction for anti-doping rule violation
- Anti-doping update from Australia with Paul Horvath - Episode 11
- Anti-doping and medical privacy
- UK Anti-Doping publishes Annual Report and Accounts 2012/13
- I PLAY FAIR Sports Law Conference