Match-fixing and the potential ‘Matuzalem effect’
Published 22 November 2013 By: Kevin Carpenter
Regular readers of my sports law blog will be aware of my strong feelings about the sanctions handed down to those found guilty of integrity offences, particularly for match-fixing.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | Football | Integrity | Match-Fixing | Swiss Federal Supreme Court (FSC) | Switzerland | UEFA | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
- Summit held at IOC headquarters to discuss the fight against doping, match-fixing, illegal betting and good governance in the Olympic movement
- Spain: First steps for coordinating measures against match fixing
- Match-fixing and the rights of individual sports participants: The Stephen Lee appeal
- Should we be comfortably satisfied with the standard of proof for match-fixing?
Kevin is a advisor and member of the editorial board for LawInSport, having previously acted as editor. In his day-to-day work he has two roles: as the Principal for his own consultancy business Captivate Legal & Sports Solutions, and Special Counsel for Sports Integrity at leading global sports technology and data company Genius Sports.