WADA Article 10.4 – Part 2
Published 18 September 2013 By: Matthew Chantler
Further to my previous article (WADA Article 10.4 "specified substances" – the end of the farce?) there has been a “further development” regarding the interpretation of Article 10.4.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Doping | National Anti-Doping Appeal Panel (NADP) | Sport | United Kingdom (UK) | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
- WADA Article 10.4 "specified substances" - the end of the farce?
- What can be done to revive the fight against doping and dopers in sport?
- Jack Anderson on the launch of #ChooseTheRightTrack - an anti-doping campaign - Part 1
- Jack Anderson's 7 point anti-doping plan #ChooseTheRightTrack - Part 2
Matthew, a solicitor at Mills & Reeve LLP, specialises in Sports Law and is an FA and RFL Registered Lawyer. He advises players' associations including Professional Players Federation, Professional Footballers' Association, PFA Scotland, Rugby Players Association, 1eagu3 and their members, a number of professional football clubs, players and agents on regulatory and legal matters.