• Home
  • News
  • Decision in the arbitration Worawi Makudi / FIFA

Decision in the arbitration Worawi Makudi / FIFA

CAS Logo

Press Release

12th February 2019

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the appeal arbitration procedure between Mr Worawi Makudi, former President of the Football Association of Thailand (FAT) (2007-2015) and former member of the Executive Committee of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) (1997-2015), and FIFA.

In 2016, following an investigation into the revision of the statutes of the FAT, the Adjudicatory Chamber of the FIFA Ethics Committee issued a decision in which Mr Makudi was found to have infringed article 17 (forgery and falsification) and article 41 (obligation of the parties to collaborate) of the FIFA Code of Ethics. It imposed a ban from taking part in any kind of football-related activity at national and international level for a period of five years and a fine of CHF 10,000. Mr Makudi appealed such decision to the FIFA Appeal Committee which reduced the ban to three years and six months and maintained the fine at CHF 10,000.

Mr Makudi filed an appeal against the FIFA Appeal Committee decision at CAS. In the decision issued today, the CAS Panel in charge of this matter considered that, on the basis of the evidence available before the CAS, Worawi Makudi did not breach Article 17 of the FIFA Code of Ethics. The breach of article 41 of the FIFA Code of Ethics was confirmed, but to a lesser degree than found by the FIFA instances. Accordingly, the CAS Panel found the appropriate sanctions to be a reprimand and a fine of CHF 5,000 and cancelled the ban from taking part in any football-related activity.

The CAS Panel noted that Mr Makudi had presented additional witnesses and new information during the CAS proceedings which was not available to the FIFA instances that issued the previous decisions. The additional evidence presented was important for the outcome of the case and the CAS Panel emphasized that Mr Makudi contributed to the fact that three instances were necessary to solve this matter because he failed to call certain witnesses in the proceedings before the FIFA instances, thereby depriving these bodies from the evidence available to CAS, which could have resulted in different decisions of the Adjudicatory Chamber and the FIFA Appeal Committee. As a consequence, the CAS Panel did not grant any costs to Mr Makudi, although he was successful in part in this appeal procedure.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.


Legal Advisors

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2022. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.