• Home
  • News
  • Result of an appeal (O'Regan) heard by the Disciplinary Panel on Thursday 15 January

Result of an appeal (O'Regan) heard by the Disciplinary Panel on Thursday 15 January

British Horseracing Authority Logo

The Disciplinary Panel of the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) on Thursday 15 January 2015 considered an appeal lodged by Denis O’Regan, the rider of DELVIN ROAD (IRE), placed fourth in the Stella Artois Maiden Hurdle, against the decision of the Bangor-on-Dee Stewards on 6 January 2015 to find him in breach of Rule (B)59.4 of the Rules of Racing and to suspend him for 10 days, in that he failed to take all reasonable and permissible measures to ensure the gelding ran on its merits.  

The Panel considered evidence from O’Regan, who was legally represented, and also viewed recordings of the race.

The Panel found that O’Regan settled DELVIN ROAD (IRE) in mid division. The pace was initially slow and then quickened down the back straight second time around. O’Regan asked DELVIN ROAD (IRE) for its effort after the third last flight and the gelding closed to within approximately eight lengths of the tiring third horse, RELIC ROCK (IRE), ridden by AP McCoy. Once in the straight O’Regan made no real or substantial effort on the gelding and finished fourth, beaten by approximately 4½ lengths for third. Following the race O’Regan made no report as an explanation for his riding in the straight. The horse was found to be lame by the Veterinary Officer after the race, of which O’Regan was unaware during the race.

The Panel confirmed the decision of the Bangor-on-Dee Stewards and considered that, in the straight, O’Regan had not carried out his responsibilities to take all reasonable and permissible measures to ensure his mount obtained the best possible placing. It felt in the straight O’Regan had not shown any timely, real or substantive effort to close on the horse in front.

The Panel dismissed the appeal and confirmed the 10 day suspension on Tuesday 20 January to Thursday 29 January 2015 inclusive. The Panel ordered that the deposit be forfeited as no further information had been added to that heard at the original enquiry which had been correct in its findings.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.


Legal Advisors

Upcoming Events

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2022. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.