Essendon appeal rejected

Press Release

12 October 2016 - The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) today welcomed the decision of the Swiss Federal Tribunal to reject the 34 Essendon players’ final appeal. 

The players lodged their appeal following the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS) finding earlier this year that each of the players had used prohibited substance Thymosin Beta 4. 

Despite numerous submissions, all arguments presented on behalf of the players were rejected by the Swiss Federal Tribunal. In particular, the Tribunal found that the players had agreed to the terms on which the CAS arbitration would take place, including that the matter be heard de novo. 

On the decision, ASADA CEO Ben McDevitt said:

You cannot agree to the rules and then expect them to change if you don’t like the outcome.” 

Furthermore, CAS exists for the very reason of ensuring sports matters are heard fairly and independently, so it is essential that they be able to review all evidence and are not limited by the findings of sports tribunals. This ensures that anti-doping rules are applied consistently between cases, which is crucial in the global fight against doping.” 

The Swiss Federal Tribunal’s ruling on the appeal means the decision of CAS, the world’s most eminent sports tribunal, is final. 

I am pleased that this matter is now finalised and I am proud of ASADA’s persistence in pursuing this case until the truth was revealed,” he said.

Views

2899

Related Articles

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

BASL
Soccerex Core Logo
SLA LOGO 1kpx
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.