NCAA Pushes Vote on Transfer Rule

By Joseph M. Hanna

26th January 2018

On January 17, 2018, an NCAA committee voted to prolong a potential vote on whether to change the Division I transfer rule. Under the “academic year in residence” rule, a transfer student must spend an academic year in residence at the school to which they are transferring. This means that players who want to transfer have to wait one year before they can start playing at their new university. As we have previously covered, this rule has been subject of several lawsuits, and currently the Seventh Circuit is deciding whether to overturn the dismissal of an antitrust claim brought by a class of players, led by former punter, Peter Deppe.

The possibility of changing the rule has been the subject of an ongoing debate within the NCAA. After it was announced that the directors voted to prolong the vote in order for the directors to have more time to consider transfer proposals, rumors began to swirl about the possibilities currently on the table. Jon Rothstein, from FanRag Sports’ reported that while “nothing is official,” that the NCAA was considering letting players with a minimum 2.7 or 2.8 grade-point average transfer without having to sit out. An NCAA spokeswoman, Michelle Brutlag Hosick, said the report was “premature” and “[t]he Transfer Working Group does not have academic benchmarks, effective dates or any of the other details of a possible uniform transfer rule worked out yet.”

Advocates of the rule change argue that it gives unpaid college athletes a measure of freedom. It would allow player who feel they are not getting what they signed up for a way out. While opponents of the rule change argue that players will run once they are faced with even a hint of adversity, and there will be consistent frenzy of transferring students, which would  give players power over their coaches and universities. However, if the NCAA is forced to pay college athletes, then the rule will once again have to be revisited.



About the Author

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph Hanna is a partner of Goldberg Segalla and concentrates his practice in commercial litigation with a focus on sports and entertainment law and retail, hospitality, and development litigation. Joe represents sports franchises, professional athletes, and movie studios with various issues related to licensing, contracts, and day-to-day management. He serves as Chair of Goldberg Segalla’s Sports and Entertainment Law Practice Group and editor of the firm’s Sports and Entertainment Law Insider blog. In addition, Joe is the Chair of Goldberg Segalla's Diversity Task Force. He possesses an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

Soccerex Core Logo
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.