NFL painkiller lawsuit dismissed

By Joseph M. Hanna published on 15 February 2017

15 February 2017

California Federal District Court Judge William Alsup dismissed in part a class-action lawsuit filed by former NFL players who alleged teams forced players to ingest painkillers in order to keep them on the field regardless of the health risks posed and the potential long-term consequences. The complaint, filed against all 32 teams of the NFL, stated the teams’ main goal was to mask pain and conceal injuries. In July 2016, Judge Alsup refused to dismiss the lawsuit, despite the NFL’s protestations that the claims were barred by statutes of limitation.

Judge Alsup, however, rejected the players’ Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) claims finding they were untimely and unsupported by facts. In his February 3, 2017 ruling, Judge Alsup stated that to prevail in a RICO claim, the players needed to demonstrate the teams conducted an enterprise through racketeering activity that caused the injury to players business or property. According to the ruling, Judge Alsup rejected the players’ contention that latent physical injuries harmed their business or property, a necessary condition for a RICO claim. Alsup also dismissed claims of conspiracy violating state law because the players failed to show “any agreement or understanding between the clubs to adhere to a return-to-play practice or policy.

Despite the other dismissals, Judge Alsup declined to dismiss state law claims of misrepresentation and concealment against eight of the 32 teams because specific stories cited in the complaint provided sufficient grounds to advance the claims past the motion to dismiss phase. The misrepresentation and concealment claims remain against the Lions, Raiders, Broncos, Packers, Seahawks, Dolphins, Chargers, and Vikings. The players are allowed until February 22, 2017 to file an amendment complaint.

Views

3326

Related Articles

About the Author

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph M. Hanna

Joseph Hanna is a partner of Goldberg Segalla and concentrates his practice in commercial litigation with a focus on sports and entertainment law and retail, hospitality, and development litigation. Joe represents sports franchises, professional athletes, and movie studios with various issues related to licensing, contracts, and day-to-day management. He serves as Chair of Goldberg Segalla’s Sports and Entertainment Law Practice Group and editor of the firm’s Sports and Entertainment Law Insider blog. In addition, Joe is the Chair of Goldberg Segalla's Diversity Task Force. He possesses an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

BASL
Soccerex Core Logo
SLA LOGO 1kpx
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.