A round up of recent football case law

Published 15 April 2015 | Authored by: Nick De Marco QC

In this round up we highlight some interesting football cases to have taken place during the first quarter of 2015. All of these cases, whether the hearings were held in court or private arbitrations/disciplinary hearings, have public judgments, and we attach the hyperlink to the full judgments of each case.

Radwan Hamed v Mills and Tottenham Hotspurs FC Ltd1

[2015] EWHC 298 (QB), 16 February 2015

Spurs were found to have breached their duty of care to a young player who suffered a cardiac arrest after the club’s doctor mistakenly recorded that he was fit to train and play whilst a cardiologist had said he may have a possible underlying cardiac condition. The club was 70% negligent and the cardiologist was 30% negligent (for failing to follow up on his recommendation for a clinical review). The case is an important reminder to football clubs of their duty of care to players particularly where they may have notice of some underlying health condition. Damages have yet to be assessed but are thought to run into millions of pounds.

 

Williams v Leeds United Football Club2

[2015] EWHC 376 (QB), 19 February 2015

The High Court dismissed a claim for wrongful dismissal by Mr Williams, the former Technical Director of Leeds United FC. Mr Williams was dismissed for gross misconduct in July 2013 following the discovery that he had in March 2008 forwarded a football-themed (but sexually explicit) email attachment to a former colleague (Dennis Wise, at that time of Newcastle United). The Court held that Mr Williams had committed gross misconduct, and that the club was entitled to accept his repudiatory breach of contract notwithstanding that it was discovered five years later, at a time when Mr Williams and the club were in dispute over the length of notice to which he was entitled having just been selected for redundancy. The Judge also held that the club was entitled to justify the dismissal by reference to evidence, discovered only after Mr Williams’ dismissal, that he had also sent the offensive attachment to a further male former colleague (Gus Poyet) outside the club, and to a receptionist at the club.

Fraser Campbell of Blackstone Chambers (instructed by Brandsmiths) appeared for Leeds United FC.

The Football League v Reading FC3

Football Disciplinary Commission, 27 February 2015

A Football Disciplinary Commission (FDC) fined Reading the sum of £30,000, but suspended the fine, after the club admitted a breach of Football League regulations prohibiting dual interests. Reading had borrowed over £10m from a company called Vibrac which also lent sums to Premier League clubs. The FL’s Regulations prohibited a club from borrowing any sums from an institution not in the ordinary course of banking if that institution also lent sums to other football clubs, even if in different leagues. The case demonstrates how stringent the FL Regulations on dual interests can be, but also shows the FDC is prepared to be recognise a club’s mitigating circumstances and co-operation with its enquiries where it made an innocent mistake, and not apply an overly harsh sanction.

Nick De Marco of Blackstone Chambers (instructed by Field Seymour Parkes LLP) acted for Reading FC.

 

Mr & Mrs Levi and another v Bates, Leeds United FC and others4

[2015] EWCA Civ 206, 12 March 2015

It was not a requirement of the statutory tort of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 19975 that the claimant be a target of the perpetrator’s conduct – a club owner and club published personal attacks on Mr Levi which included references to his home address and invitations to fans to phone him up. Mrs Levi was not “targeted” by the conduct but was victim of it and thus entitled to damages (but not an injunction).

 

Hull City v The Football Association6

FA Rule K Arbitral Panel, 23 February 215, decision published 16 March 2015

An FA Rule K Arbitral Panel set aside (on procedural fairness grounds) the decision of the FA Council to reject the Club’s application to change its playing name from Hull City to Hull Tigers for season 2014/2015.  The Panel did not remit the matter to the FA Council, and the Club remains Hull City.  The Club is able to apply anew to change its name for season 2015/2016.

Adam Lewis QC (instructed by Charles Russell) acted for the FA and Nick De Marco  also of Blackstone Chambers (led by Nicholas Randall QC, and instructed by Brabners) represented Hull City.

See here for an article on the case written by Nicholas Randall QC and Nick De Marco published by LawInSport.7

To subscribe to the Blackstone Chambers sports law updates, which includes additional blogs not on LawInSport, go to https://sportslawbulletin.org/

 

Related Articles

About the Author

Nick De Marco

Nick De Marco QC

Nick is rated a leading silk in Sports Law and is a member of Blackstone Chambers.

He has advised and acted for a number of sports governing bodies, athletes, most Premier League football clubs and many world-class football players in commercial and regulatory disputes.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

BASL
Soccerex Core Logo
SLA LOGO 1kpx
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.