Cross-code transfers in Rugby – Will the Denny Solomona case set a new precedent?James Hill
Cross-code transfers have been a feature of the Rugby League / Rugby Union dichotomy for decades. However, Denny Solomona's recent controversial move of officially retiring from the Super League’s Castleford Tigers to sign a new contract with the English Premiership’s Sale Sharks sets a new precedent. Castleford have now commenced proceedings in the High Court against Solomona, his agent and Sale Sharks. The case could arguably affect cross-code transfers in the way that the Bosman ruling affected football back in the 1990s.
This article examines the key legal issues arising out of Solomona’s case, namely:
- The factual background;
- The prospect of success of Castleford's claims against Solomona for breach of contract;
- The prospects of success of Castleford's claims against Sale Sharks and Solomona's agent, Andrew Clarke, for inducing breach of contract; and
- The impact that the case may have on future cross code moves and any processes which may be put in place to prevent moves being forced through in a similar manner.
...to continue reading register here for free
LawInSport is an independent publisher used by sports lawyers, sports business executives and administrators, athletes and support personnel, academics and students to stay informed of the latest legal issues and developments from the world of sport. It is our mission to improve the accountability, transparency and standard of the administration and governance of sport and the understanding of the law.
Thank you for considering becoming a member of LawInSport, supporting independent media and the promotion well researched, reference and accessible legal information that contributes to greater transparency and accountability in the sport and legal sectors.
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Australia | Australian Rules Football | Contract | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Employment | English Premiership Rugby | FIFA | Fiji | Football | National Football League (NFL) | RFL Operational Rules | RFL Standard Contact | Rugby | Rugby Football League (RFL) | Rugby Union | Super League | United Kingdom (UK) | United States of America (USA)
- Can you prevent cross-code player poaching in rugby?
- The legality of fixed-term employment contracts in European professional football – The Müller case and beyond
- How CAS deals with excessive contractual penalties in football
- When do playing contracts become binding? Hopoate v Parramatta Eels
About the Author
James Hill is an Associate at Onside Law. James works on a broad range of commercial disputes, including High Court claims and arbitration, as well as a variety of regulatory matters. In particular, James has experience of obtaining injunctive relief against employees for breach of contract and theft of confidential information.