Intellectual property rights update: key cases for sport in 2017/18

Published 08 June 2018 | Authored by: Sean Corbett

At a time when the commercial importance of trademarks are more important than ever, a study1 published in the Harvard Law Review found that 81% of 1000 of the most common words are already registered as single-word marks, and suggests “we” are running out of good marks. What could this mean for sport, and more importantly the impact on brand protection activities? Well, given that often the most creative and recognisable trade marks incorporate design elements and word combinations there would seem to be no immediate need to panic. Any new sports brands, teams, franchises looking to make an impact can still rely on creativity and the trade mark clearance process to launch a new brand on the marketplace and field of play.

Against that interesting backdrop, this article reviews the most significant developments in Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) in sport in the last year. While in Europe, non-conventional marks such as colour marks and shape marks were in the spotlight once again; in the US the long running dispute over disparaging marks raged on. Specifically, we examine:

  • Disparaging marks and their interaction with the US First Amendment – the Washington Redskins case

  • The latest on “non-conventional” trade marks

  • Graphical representation

  • A quick mention of Brexit

  • Unjustified threats – a review of the Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017

  • The politics of a logo – the case of UKIP and the Premier League

  • Image rights – the case of Pro Evolution Soccor and Diego Maradona

  • What’s in a nick-name – the case of Thanasi Kokkinakis and Kellog

  • Trade mark clearance – the clearance process when launching or revamping a trade mark:

    • The Vegas Golden Knights – difficulties with the name supposedly chosen to avoid disputes

    • Formula 1 – Liberty Media’s revamp

    • Welcome to Miami – Beckham’s new newly approved MLS Miami franchise

    • Wembley Stadium naming woes

  • First to file & copyright cases – the Dulwich Hamlet FC case

  • Infringement –keeping the wolf from the door, the Wolves FC logo dispute

  • Commentary

...to continue reading register here for free

 

LawInSport is an independent publisher used by sports lawyers, sports business executives and administrators, athletes and support personnel, academics and students to stay informed of the latest legal issues and developments from the world of sport. It is our mission to improve the accountability, transparency and standard of the administration and governance of sport and the understanding of the law.

Thank you for considering becoming a member of LawInSport, supporting independent media and the promotion well researched, reference and accessible legal information that contributes to greater transparency and accountability in the sport and legal sectors.

 


 

Related Articles

About the Author

Sean Corbett

Sean Corbett

Sean is an IP practitioner and trade mark attorney with a unique insight into, and focus on, brand protection issues. After 14 action-fueled years at Formula One Management Ltd where he was Brand Protection Manager Sean has set up on his own as a Brand Protection Consultant offering a unique one-stop resource for every conceivable brand protection challenge to help protect, develop and strengthen the IP rights that are crucial to commercial success.

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

BASL
Soccerex Core Logo
SLA LOGO 1kpx
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2017. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.