The participation of trans athletes in sport – a transformation in approach?

Published 05 February 2016 | Authored by: Liz Riley

This article discusses the issues surrounding participation of trans athletes in sport, in particular in light of the new International Olympic Committee (IOC) Transgender Guidelines. The author, Liz Riley, is a barrister in Bird & Bird's Sports Group and has advised sports governing bodies on this issue at both national and international level. She assisted the IOC with the production of its new Transgender Guidelines, and also represented the IAAF in relation to a recent challenge to its rules governing the eligibility of female athletes with hyperandrogenism to compete in women's competition (Chand v AFI & IAAF, CAS 2014/A/3759). All views expressed in this article are the author's own.

Bruce (now Caitlyn) Jenner won a gold medal in the men's decathlon at the 1976 Olympic Games. However, she is perhaps now better known for her recent 'coming out' as transgender.

In doing so, she highlighted an issue that the sports world is having to grapple with on an increasingly frequent basis, namely, how to deal with the participation of trans athletes in sport.

This is very much a live issue, from grass roots right up to the elite level (for example, Chris Mosier recently became the first openly trans man to make a US men's national team, competing in the sprint duathlon at the Duathlon National Championships).1

This article considers the key issues that arise in relation to the participation of trans athletes, the different approaches taken by sports governing bodies (including the recently-revised IOC Transgender Guidelines2), the interplay with national laws, and some of the legal challenges involved. It is intended to provide further insight into this complex area, and the author welcomes further comment and discussion on this important topic.

For the purposes of this article, the umbrella term 'trans' is used to refer to individuals whose own gender identity is different from the biological sex assigned to them at birth (whether or not they have undergone any form of medical intervention).


The key issues

The vast majority of sports divide competition into male and female categories.3

This is due to the significant physical advantages enjoyed (on average) by men from puberty onwards,4 which at elite level result in a gulf in sports performance between the sexes. For example, the world records in athletics show an average performance difference between men and women of around 12%.5

These physical differences between the sexes are thought to be due, principally, to the much higher levels of testosterone produced by males from puberty onwards, giving males greater strength and power than females.6 As a result, separation of the sexes is therefore required to allow for fair and meaningful competition, as well as to address potential health and safety concerns (for example, in contact sports).

This notion of fair and meaningful competition goes to the very essence of what sport is about. It reflects the underlying need to preserve the uncertainty of the sporting outcome, with success being determined by those particular factors that are valued by the sport in question (such as natural talent and training).

And it is this need that underlies the various dividing lines that are drawn in sport, such as age and weight categories, and the numerous Paralympic classifications. It would not, for example, be fair or meaningful for a flyweight boxer to compete against a super heavyweight boxer: there is little doubt who would win, and it would not celebrate any worthwhile sporting values.

Similarly, if women were required to compete against men, they would have very limited opportunities to succeed (at least at the elite level), and would not be rewarded for their sporting excellence or incentivised to make the sacrifices needed to reach their potential.


How do trans athletes fit in to the male/female athletics categories?

The division of competition into male and female categories raises a number of issues when it comes to the participation of trans athletes in sport:

  1. It is generally accepted that prior to puberty (when male and female testosterone levels are similar) there is little physical difference between the sexes,7 and mixed sex sport is often permitted (for example, the English FA allows mixed football up to the under 18 age group). Accordingly, there appears to be (and should be) little issue regarding the participation of trans athletes, in line with their gender identity, at this stage.

    For example, many international and national bodies (including World Rugby, the International Tennis Federation, the English FA and the Rugby Football League) allow individuals who have undergone female-to-male sex reassignment before puberty to participate as males, and individuals who have undergone male-to-female sex reassignment before puberty to participate as females, without restriction.8

  2. After the onset of puberty, however (when male serum testosterone levels increase to around ≥10 nmol/L, while female testosterone levels remain at around 0.1-3.08 nmol/L),9 the physical advantages enjoyed by men raise fairness and safety concerns in relation to the participation of trans athletes in line with their gender identity.

    In particular, there are concerns that a male-to-female transsexual might have an unfair performance advantage over other women (raising concerns as to fair competition and the safety of competitors), whereas a female-to-male transsexual might be thought to be at a disadvantage compared to other men (raising safety concerns in relation to their own participation). Sports governing bodies have to decide how best to address these difficult issues.

The current regulatory responses and the new IOC Transgender Guidelines  

The regulatory position regarding the participation of trans athletes in sport is complex. In particular, there is presently no consensus among sports regulators as to how best to respond to the sporting challenges, and no uniform approach.

In some sports the issues are simply not acknowledged or addressed at all (as, for example, in international cycling). In others, the issues are addressed in a variety of different ways, from the very restrictive to the very permissive and inclusive.10 For example:

  1. One very restrictive approach is CrossFit's 'female at birth' policy, which requires that all competitors in the female category have been 'born as a female'. This rather blunt and exclusionary approach is currently being challenged before the US courts,11 and it is certainly a stark contrast to the more nuanced positions discussed below.12 Indeed, the LPGA voted to remove a similar rule back in 2011 following a challenge by transgender golfer Lana Lawless.13

  2. Another relatively conservative approach was the 2003 IOC Stockholm Consensus (now replaced by the new IOC Transgender Guidelines), which set out recommendations applicable to the Olympic Games.14 The IOC consensus provided that individuals undergoing sex reassignment after puberty would only be eligible to participate in the competition category of their affirmed sex if:
    1. surgical anatomical changes had been completed, including external genitalia changes and gonadectomy (removal of the ovaries or testes);
    2. legal recognition of their affirmed sex had been conferred;
    3. hormone therapy had been administered for a sufficient length of time to minimise gender-related advantages in sport; and
    4. eligibility should begin no sooner than two years after gonadectomy.

  3. Many international and national federations presently apply the 2003 IOC Stockholm Consensus to their own competitions, sometimes with certain tweaks.15

    To take one example, under the IAAF's current regulations16 a male-to-female transsexual's eligibility to compete in female international athletics competition is dealt with by an expert medical panel on a case-by-case basis.

    The athlete will be eligible to compete in women’s competition provided that her medical treatment following sex reassignment has been administered for a sufficient length of time so as to minimise any advantage in women’s competition. To assess this, the panel looks at a range of factors (Regulation 8.3):

    1. the athlete's age;
    2. whether sex reassignment took place pre or post-puberty;
    3. the nature of the sex reassignment procedure undertaken;
    4. the period of time since completion of the sex reassignment procedure;
    5. the athlete's androgen levels; and
    6. the nature, duration and results of any treatment and monitoring undertaken following completion of the sex reassignment procedure.
  4. Notably, however, there is no mandatory minimum waiting period following the reduction of the athlete's androgen levels. Meanwhile, female-to-male transsexuals are eligible to participate in men's competition if legal recognition of their male sex has been conferred.

  5. As scientific understanding developed, the 2003 IOC Stockholm Consensus was much criticised17 as imposing overly stringent and costly requirements on trans athletes, including requiring completion of surgical anatomical changes (and ignoring non-surgical alternatives, i.e. hormone therapy); the need for legal recognition of the person's affirmed sex, which in some jurisdictions is simply not possible under national law; and the mandatory two year waiting period following gonadectomy.

    As a result, the IOC recommendations (now the 'IOC Transgender Guidelines') have recently been revised and provide for a more inclusive approach.18

    The new guidelines set out recommendations for international federations and others to consider when adopting their own rules in this area. In summary, those whotransition from female to male are eligible to compete in the male category without restriction. Those who transition from male to female are now eligible to compete in the female category provided that (paragraph 2):

    1. their declared gender identity is female (which declaration cannot be changed, for sporting purposes, for at least four years); and
    2. their total serum testosterone level has been below 10 nmol/L for at least 12 months (although it is important to note that a longer time period may be imposed on a case-by-case basis, depending on whether 12 months is sufficient to minimise any advantage in women's competition in the circumstances of the particular case19), and it remains below 10 nmol/L throughout the period of desired participation.

    Compliance with those conditions may be monitored by testing, and in theevent of non-compliance the athlete’s eligibility for female competition will be suspended for 12 months (paragraph 2.4).

  6. Many national sports bodies take a yet more permissive approach, particularly for domestic competition. One interesting example from the UK is the English FA's recently issued 'Policy on Trans People in Football' governing domestic football, which is again focused on testosterone levels.20

    In particular, for players aged 18 and over eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis, having regard to the safety of the applicant and fellow players, and the need to ensure fair competition (clauses 5.3 and 5.4). For male-to-female transsexuals there is an initial presumption that those requirements are met where hormone therapy or gonadectomy (removal of the ovaries or testes) results in testosterone levels in the female range for an appropriate length of time so as to minimise any potential advantage (clause 5.5).

    Similarly, for female-to-male transsexuals (clause 5.5) there is an initial presumption that those requirements are met where hormone therapy results in testosterone levels in the male range for an appropriate length of time so as to minimise any potential advantage (presumably enjoyed by the applicant's male competitors, rather than by the applicant himself). However, there is also discretion to allow participation even in the absence of hormone therapy or gonadectomy. Like the IAAF, there is also no mandatory minimum waiting period.

    Also of interest are Badminton England 21 and British Rowing,22 which presently follow the 2003 IOC recommendations for international competition but take a less stringent approach at domestic level. In particular, in both of those sports a male-to-female transsexual who transitioned post-puberty is able to compete in domestic female competition on providing evidence that her testosterone levels have been brought within the female range (or alternatively, in the case of rowing, that she has had a gonadectomy).      

    One key example from the US is the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) policy, which sets out recommendations for the participation of transgender students in NCAA sports.23 Again, this takes a less stringent approach, for example, recommending that male-to-female transsexuals be eligible to participate in women's competition after completing one year of testosterone suppression treatment(similar to the new IOC criterion).

  7. Unsurprisingly, one of the most permissive and inclusive policies is that adopted for the Gay Games. This allows for participation based on (among other things) legal sex alone, or where the individual can demonstrate that they have been living in the particular gender for at least two years, or have been undergoing hormone treatment for at least one year.24


National law requirements

Whatever approach is taken, sports must also ensure that they comply with applicable national law requirements. This is well illustrated by the recent interim award in Chand v AFI & IAAF,25 concerning the separate but related issue of the eligibility of female athletes with hyperandrogenism (elevated levels of natural testosterone) to compete in women's competition.

Dutee Chand

In this case the question of whether the relevant sporting rules constituted unlawful discrimination (under, among other things, the laws of Monaco) was discussed at length, and the IAAF was required to demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that the restrictions placed on participation of such athletes in women's competition were necessary and proportionate to the achievement of a legitimate aim (namely, the preservation of fair competition).

In that respect, although the court accepted that the "IAAF hasintroduced the Hyperandrogenism Regulations to provide for fair competition and a level playing field within the female category … [and] the Hyperandrogenism Regulations are therefore intended to pursue a legitimate objective' , it found that the IAAF had not established that hyperandrogenic athletes 'enjoy such a substantial performance advantage over non-hyperandrogenic female athletes that excluding them from competing in the female category, and thereby excluding them from competing at all unless they take medication or undergo treatment, is a necessary and proportionate means of preserving fairness in athletics competition and/or policing the binary male/female classification".

The court therefore suspended the application of the regulations pending the submission of further evidence on that issue by the IAAF.26

The U.K.

Similarly, in the UK the Gender Recognition Act 2004 provides that the participation of trans athletes may only be prohibited or restricted in gender-affected sports (i.e. sports where the physical strength, stamina or physique of average persons of one gender would put them at a disadvantage to average persons of the other gender ) where it is necessary to do so to ensure fair competition or the safety of competitors.27

The Sports Council Equality Group (comprising representatives of the sports councils of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and UK Sport) has issued further detailed guidance on those requirements,28 suggesting different approaches for contact and non-contact sports, and at domestic and international level.

While various policy options are suggested, they are all heavily focused on testosterone levels (for example, recommending that a male-to-female transsexual be eligible to compete in women's competition if she can show that hormone therapy has brought her testosterone levels within the female range or that she has had a gonadectomy; and, for contact sports, a recommendation that a female-to-male transsexual have testosterone levels in the male range in order to be eligible to compete in men's competition).29


The challenges

As is clear from the above, the participation of trans athletes in sport is without doubt a complex area, with no obvious or straightforward solution. However, it is not something that sport can ignore, and there are many benefits to having a clear and considered policy that seeks to preserve competitive balance and address any safety concerns, while also providing trans athletes with an opportunity to participate.

As to what such a policy might look like, that may well depend on the sport in question and on the particular fairness and safety considerations that apply (for example, in contact sports versus non-contact sports).30

As seen in the existing policies, the approach may also differ as between elite-level competition and grass roots/recreational sport (see, for example,the very inclusive policy adopted for the Gay Games, which may well not be appropriate at elite level).

That said, there is certainly scope for sport to take a more proactive and joined-up approach in this area, for example, by looking at developing certain broad principles that can be universally applied, as well as ensuring that policies are evidence-based and in line with current scientific and medical understanding.31 The new IOC Transgender Guidelines will also serve as a useful starting point for discussion.


Current approaches

As to the current approaches taken by sports bodies, the recent trend is most definitely towards a more nuanced and permissive approach. In particular, the new IOC guidelines are, in the author’s opinion, to be welcomed and represent an important step forward in this area.

It is also worth observing that a key factor appearing in almost every approach is the consideration of testosterone levels (although this does present its own challenges in relation to the need for ongoing monitoring for compliance).

On the other hand, an approach based exclusively on testosterone levels (such as that of the English FA, and suggested by the Sports Council Equality Group ) may not always cater for all scenarios (for example, factors such as height and size may also be relevant in certain sports). The requirement that female-to-male transsexuals have testosterone levels 'in the male range' (ostensibly due to safety concerns) also seems potentially problematic (in particular, the 'male range' is not specified in such policies, and while a normal male range does exist there will be males with testosterone levels outside of that range).

In contrast, the IAAF approach, while involving a large discretionary element, does have the benefit of allowing for a case-by-case assessment in light of certain broader principles.  

Looking to the future, to add to the already complex position, a further challenge for sports regulators is the increasing ease of changing one’s legal sex in some jurisdictions,32 compared to the difficulty or even impossibility of doing so in others. As a result, sports authorities will need to consider whether legal recognition of trans athletes in their preferred sex remains a necessary requirement (for example, where an individual has undergone full sex reassignment but remains unable to change his/her legal sex), or indeed a sufficient requirement (for example, where an individual has been able to change his/her legal sex without undergoing any form of medical intervention).33

In addition, while not explored further in this article, it is also worth noting two separate but related issues (each complex in their own right, and outside the scope of the IOC Transgender Guidelines):

  1. How to deal with the increasing recognition of a 'third sex'34 i.e. something other than 'male' or 'female', and sometimes referred to as 'X' (now recognised in various countries including Australia, Bangladesh, Germany, India, Nepal, New Zealand and Pakistan).
  2. How to address the participation of intersex athletes i.e. individuals with so-called 'differences of sex development', who have a mixture of male and female sexual characteristics and may consider themselves either male or female.35


Related Articles

About the Author

Liz Riley

Liz Riley

Liz Riley is a barrister in Bird & Bird's Sports Group and has advised sports governing bodies on this issue at both national and international level. She assisted the IOC with the production of its new transgender guidelines, and also represented the IAAF in relation to a recent challenge to its rules governing the eligibility of female athletes with hyperandrogenism to compete in women's competition (CAS 2014/A/3759, Chand v AFI & IAAF).

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Comments (2)

  • Nic van

    26 February 2016 at 18:34 | #

    Do the new transgender guidelines open up the possibility for all female athletes to participate in male competition if they choose to?


  • Kirsti Miller

    28 March 2018 at 00:14 | #

    Could you please enlighten me in what science was used to determine 12 months of reduced testosterone levels for XY Transitioning and XY Transitioned females by the IOC when they amended their trans par guidelines?

    Also for reference the term transsexual was outdated years ago and considered offensive to transgender people.

    The umbrella term Transgender can no longer be used it is far to broader term these days for sports policy development as there are massive differences in the endocrine system and physiology between XY transitioning and transitioned females.

    XY women (fully transitioned) are the only athletes competing unhealthy in a complete androgen deprivation state and well beyond a (post menopause state). Incredibly unhealthy and spore eventually becomes impossible as the body deteriorates as it cannot respond to day-to-day functions without androgens as the bodies primary communications and regulator hormone.

    Moreover and important, the XY transitioned female is the only body that can show the health and key markers where the body turns on then off, as the body loses its ability to regulate androgens.

    Which then causes complete androgen deprivation of the human body, heavily contraindicates it as testosterone plays over 200 functions in the body every single day separate of the sex of the physiology.

    A transitioning XY Female (pre op) are hypgonatic, not feeling full effects of complete androgen deprivation and plus 2 dozen contraindications because they still have gonads. If they were a HP athlete prior and during continued transition minimising the advantage in women's competition away takes even longer years longer.

    There are still many questions to be answered in relation to the participation of transitioning and transitioned XY Females and XX Males, this is defiantly a work in progress. Not many people are aware that the IOC created the current transgender guidelines in half a day with no science or research. They did this as a hip response to lesson liability in Kristen Worley's human rights case in the divisional court in Canada. The current transgender and intersex IOC & WADA policies and guidelines are not based on any science. There were 90 people involved in the IOC Consensus Meeting in 2015 most people were sports officials with no qualifications to even be in this meeting and they defiantly are not medically qualified to write policies relating to the health and welfare of all female athletes globally.

    Kristen's victory in Toronto exposed both WADA and the IOC's policies to have breached human rights of many female athletes and their current policies continue to do so. Kristen's case also identified that both WADA & the IOC do not even have the right starting point in this conversation it is so much more then testosterone levels the full diversity of human physiology must now be fully considered when new policies are developed. There is a long way to go in this conversation.

    There are many sporting organisations considering the future direction of global sport none more so then world cycling and the Commonwealth Games Committee, they are doing a lot of work in this area. The days of just believing the IOC and WADA have all the answers has long gone the recent Russian Drug fiasco is a clear example of what the IOC don't know. Kristen's victory showed sports can't start writing these type of policies starting from a human rights focus they must have the science and research first.

    During my discussions with both Australian and international colleagues I feel the direction of global sport will involve having one gender policy for all women no matter their chromosomal makeup. Every group of females may have different criteria to compete but sport will start from the point that everyone is firstly acccepted and they are only denied the right to compete if they have a proven unnatural advantage.

    I also see the future of some sports being separated on abilities and physical attributes similar to the way the Paralympics separate sports.

    There is no doubt that XY Males on average have an advantage in strength speed and endurance. Just looking at all sports world sporting records clearly shows this to be true.

    In relation to Hannah and the AFL I would suggest the AFL completely ignore the IOC's Current guidelines because as I previously stated the IOC has admitted their policy was not based on any facts or science.

    The AFL is unlike any Olympic Sport it is a very high impact sport even more so for females I suggest. Recent studies haveshown females are more likely to suffer knee injuries and the impact and severity of concussions are more severe in female athletes.

    The greatest challenge for the trans and gender diverse communities is being accepted in female sports in particular high impact sports like Australian Rules Football. I suggest erring on the side of caution with all sports at the elite level or high impact sports like the AFL.

    Some sports like Australian Cycling have different criteria to be met at each level of their sport with local competitions having self identification as the only prerequisite to participation.

    I don't suggest this type of policy would work for the AFL because we are not just talking about winning or losing we are talking about the health and safety of all participants. On this point this is where I believe the AFL has made the biggest mistake with Hannah allowing her to play at the local level but not at the elite where the other players are stronger, fitter and more developed then the grassroots players.


Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Official partners 

Soccerex Core Logo
YRDA Logo2
SAC logo LawAccord

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2018. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.