Why are athletes held to a higher standard than medical professionals in anti-doping? Contrasting the Gil Roberts case and Team Sky scandalJessica van der Meer
Two recent news events in the world of anti-doping illustrate how disjointed current anti-doping regulation is and that significant changes will need to be made if we want to realise "clean sports".
The first news event is the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) decision in World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) v Gil Roberts1, the American sprinter and Olympic (Rio) gold medallist, from 25 January 2017. The case has become infamous because Roberts was successful in his "kissing" defence, following in the footsteps of French tennis player Richard Gasquet’s successful “cocaine kiss” defence in 2009 (see below). The second news event is the House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s Report on Combatting doping in sport2 and the controversy now surrounding Team Sky, Bradley Wiggins and Mo Farah.
This article reviews the Gil Roberts case, the DCMS Report and then offers commentary on the current state of anti-doping in sport in light of these events.
...to continue reading register here for free
LawInSport is an independent publisher used by sports lawyers, sports business executives and administrators, athletes and support personnel, academics and students to stay informed of the latest legal issues and developments from the world of sport. It is our mission to improve the accountability, transparency and standard of the administration and governance of sport and the understanding of the law.
Thank you for considering becoming a member of LawInSport, supporting independent media and the promotion well researched, reference and accessible legal information that contributes to greater transparency and accountability in the sport and legal sectors.
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Athletics | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Cycling | DCMS Report Combatting Doping in Sport | Doping | Team Sky | Tennis | Therapeutic Use Exemption | United Kingdom (UK) | United States of America (USA) | WADA Code | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
- INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 6 March - 19 March 2018
- U SPORTS Football Athlete Suspended for Presence of Cannabis
- CAS confirms 4 year period of ineligibility imposed on Tomasz Zielinski
- COC to host WADA’s first Global Athlete Forum in Calgary this June
About the Author
Jessica is a Barrister at 2 Temple Gardens. Her work embraces the wide range of 2TG’s specialisations: negligence, commercial, international, public and sports law.
Her sports related practice covers all major sports with a particularfocus onanti-doping cases (WADA and on a national level) in cycling and weightlifting.