Why FIFA needs to provide a specific regulatory framework for football coaches (the difficulties in resolving club-coach disputes and the application of Swiss law)
Published 18 September 2019 By: Josep F. Vandellos Alamilla
One of the primary issues affecting disputes between football coaches and their clubs is the lack of an applicable regulatory framework. The FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) do not directly apply to coaches/managers (a point confirmed in recent decisions1 of both the FIFA Players’ Status Committee (PSC) and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS2)), and there are no other specific intra-federation regulations governing their status.
In the author’s experience this situation is causing considerable difficulties in terms of consistency and expectations when it comes to trying to resolve club-coach disputes – typically relating to termination of employment – before the PSC and CAS. Part of the problem is that many of the employment contracts expressly refer to disputes being settled “in accordance with FIFA regulations” or “in accordance with the RSTP” (or words to that effect). The parties (and practitioners) therefore presume that they have the backing of a flexible and sport-specific regulatory framework, when in fact they do not. The reality is that Swiss law can end up being applied in default, leading to unexpected and unsatisfactory outcomes for the parties.
Drawing on the author’s experiences, this article examines club-coach disputes before the PSC and CAS (i.e. those with an international dimension) and looks at the current misconceptions regarding the application of FIFA regulations, why Swiss law can be applied in default, and the problems that this can lead to for the parties.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: CAS Code | Coaches | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Employment | FIFA | FIFA Players’ Status Committee (PSC) | FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) | FIFA Statutes | Football | Italy | Managers | Regulation | Spain | Swiss Law of Obligations | UK
- Training compensation and solidarity payments - FIFA activates Article 13 to help clubs fast-track disputes
- FIFA’s proposed solidarity mechanism reforms – an effective solution or a lost opportunity?
- Changing the game: Dissecting the landmark reforms endorsed by the FIFA Football Stakeholders Committee
- FIFA’s clearing house: the future of solidarity mechanism & training compensation
- A legal guide to training compensation in football under the FIFA Regulations
- A legal guide to solidarity payments in football under the FIFA Regulations
Josep is an independent lawyer with extensive experience in international sports law. During the last ten years his practice has entirely focused in representing athletes, clubs, national associations, agents and coaches in front of the different dispute resolution bodies and the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne (Switzerland). He also advises his clients on a regular basis in contract drafting and negotiations.