How France balances the right of free speech against obligations owed to an employer - The Gus Poyet case
In France, recent events have illustrated the possible excesses of athletes/coaches when they are interviewed by the media. The case concerns the coach of the Girondins de Bordeaux Football Club, Gustavo Poyet. In August 2018, during a press conference following a Europa League Championship match, Gus Poyet made direct criticisms1 of the club's management regarding the sale of one of their players, Gaetan Laborde, against his will. Poyet even went as far as mentionning his possible resignation during the quite extraordinary interview:
It is a shame that they did this against me, against the players, against the fans. I can't accept that. I need explanations from the owners and the president. When they explain this to me, we'll see if I can keep going. I don't care about the Bordeaux leaders who talk from behind, they try to kill me from behind. It is up to them to talk with you.2
In light of the events, this piece examines the balance that France strikes between an individual’s right to free speech, and the simultaneous duties that they owe to their employer.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Charte du football professionnel | Disciplinary Regulation of the Professional Football League | Employment | European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms | Football | France | Free Speech | French Labour Code | Labour | National Collective Agreement on Sport | Sport
- How much privacy can sports stars now expect in the UK?
- Free speech vs. athletes’ right of publicity: The Supreme Court’s Madden NFL decision