Jurisdiction Disputes: When Can National Bodies Hear FIFA-Related Employment Claims?
How Sports Arbitration Is Evolving In China - The New 2023 Sports Arbitration Law
Challenging Appointment Of Arbitrators: Swiss Federal Tribunal's Decision Highlights Uniqueness Of Sports
Automatic Promotion Dispute: The curious case of Polokwane City v South African Football Association
An Introduction To Portugal’s Court Of Arbitration For Sport: A Unique Arbitral Body
Nike And Chilean National Team: Sponsorship Dispute Reaches The Copa América
Ad Hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport registers its first cases
Tokyo, 19 July 2021 – The Ad Hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) will hold its first hearing today in the matter: OG 20/03 Jennifer Harding-Marlin v. St Kitts and Nevis Olympic Committee & FINA.
Shelby Houlihan found guilty of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the arbitration procedure between the US track and field athlete Shelby Houlihan and World Athletics (WA):
- Shelby Houlihan is found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) pursuant to Rule 2.1 and Rule 2.2 of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules. • Shelby Houlihan is subject to a period of ineligibility of four (4) years starting on 14 January 2021.
- All competitive results obtained by Shelby Houlihan from 15 December 2020 through to 14 January 2021 are disqualified, including forfeiture of any titles, awards, medals, points and prize and appearance money obtained during this period.
CAS confirms the decision of the African Football Confederation (CAF) to postpone the match to 14 June 2021 but refers the matter back to CAF to decide any possible sanctions against the Sierra Leone FA
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruled today on the appeal filed by the Fédération béninoise de football (FBF) following the decision to postpone the match Sierra Leone – Benin counting for the qualifiers of the CAN Total Cameroon 2021.
Newcastle United Takeover: Why The Premier League Should Amend Its Rules On The Appointment & Challenge Of Arbitrators
The Blake Leeper Case - CAS Panel Rejects Double Amputee’s Appeal To Compete At The Olympics
The EU General Court’s Ruling On Exclusive Arbitration Agreements In The ISU Case
An Introduction To The Annual Review On Sports Dispute Resolution In China (2020)
Russia doping ban is halved after CAS ruling
Russia's ban from all major sporting events after a doping scandal has been cut to two years by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
IPC statement regarding CAS decision on WADA v RUSADA
The International Paralympic Committee (IPC) acknowledges today’s decision by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to rule that the Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) is non-compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code.
Hazan, Lewis v/ PAOK Basketball Club
GPK Sports Management Ltd., Edge Sports International, Inc. v/ Galatasaray Sports Club
Grigalauskyte v/ Izmit Belediyespor Genlik Kulübü Dernegi
World Athletics v Marina Arzamasova
Sport Resolutions welcomes Lord Nicholas Wilson as a Member of the Sport Resolutions Panel of Arbitrators and Mediators
Broadcaster Seven Network takes Cricket Australia to federal court
CAS Arbitrator Denies U.S. Triathlon Athlete Andrew Starykowicz’s Appeal Against Therapeutic Use Exemption Decision
FIFA lifts suspension of the Trinidad and Tobago Football Association
Decision in the matter Shayna Jack v/ Swimming Australia & Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority
Sports Lawyer In The Spotlight: Farai Razano
Annual Review on Sports Dispute Resolution in China
Key Principles On Player Contracts From The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (Part 2: Interpretation & Performance)
Results & Evaluation of Pro Bono Legal Services at the Tokyo 2020 Games
Incomplete, Unclear & Contradictory...How CAS & the Swiss Federal Tribunal Approach Pathological Arbitration Clauses
Sport Resolutions to speak at the Asian International Arbitration Centre event
The Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC) is hosting a webinar, titled “The Standard of Proof in Anti-Doping Arbitration: Understanding Comfortable Satisfaction” in conjunction with the AIAC September Sports Month 2021.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) Ad Hoc Division registers its fifth case
Tokyo, 22 July 2021 – The Ad Hoc Division of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has registered its fifth arbitration procedure: CAS OG 20/05 Oksana Kalashnikova & Ekaterine Gorgodze v. International Tennis Federation (ITF) and Georgian National Olympic Committee & Georgia Tennis Federation.
Audley Sheppard QC appointed new chair of Sport Resolutions
Audley Sheppard QC has been appointed as the new Chair of the Sport Resolutions’ Board, taking over from Edwin Glasgow CBE, QC.
CAS dismisses the 2nd appeal of Blake Leeper
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed the appeal filed on 1 May 2021 by US bilateral transtibial amputee sprinter Blake Leeper against the decision taken by the Mechanical Aids Review panel established by World Athletics (WA) dated 26 April 2021 in which the athlete’s 24 December 2020 application to run at WA-sanctioned events on Running Specific Prostheses (RSPs) that give him an overall standing height of 185.42 cm (6’1”) was denied. The WA panel did so on grounds that the height of the proposed RSPs conferred upon Mr Leeper an “overall competitive advantage over an athlete not using such aid” and were accordingly “not allowed” by Article R6.3.4 of WA’s Technical Rules. Accordingly, the decision rendered by the WA Mechanical Aids Review panel on 26 April 2021 is confirmed by CAS.
Sports Disputes and Disciplinary Procedures - the Year in review 2020/21
Inappropriate Tweets & The 'Duty Of Curiosity': Why The Swiss Federal Tribunal Ordered The Sun Yang Case Be Reheard
Access To Justice For Survivors Of (Sexual) Harassment And Abuse In Sports
Annual Review On Sports Dispute Resolution In China (2020)
WADA v RUSADA: Reduced sanction leaves many questions
Sport Integrity Australia CEO David Sharpe has expressed disappointment for Australian athletes as a result of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) decision to reduce the four-year sanction on Russia by the World Anti-Doping Agency.
Statement from USADA CEO Travis T. Tygart on Russia CAS Appeal and Ruling
“USADA acknowledges the devastating decision from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in the Russia case that hands WADA and clean athletes a significant loss. At this stage in this sordid Russian state-sponsored doping affair, now spanning close to a decade, there is no consolation in this weak, watered-down outcome. To once again escape a meaningful consequence proportional to the crimes, much less a real ban, is a catastrophic blow to clean athletes, the integrity of sport, and the rule of law.
CAS decision in the arbitration WADA v. RUSADA
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the arbitration procedure between the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the Russian AntiDoping Agency (RUSADA), with 50 intervening parties, including the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) and the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF).
Milovic v/ KB Bashkimi
Helmanis v/ BC Spartak Saint Petersburg
Morgan v/ Amis du Basketball Contern
UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) v Darren Eales
Stanislav Poplavskyy receives lifetime ban from tennis
U.S. Weightlifting Athlete Anthony McLaughlin Receives Sanction for Anti-Doping Rule Violation
Sport Integrity Australia acknowledges decision in the Shayna Jack matter
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) imposes a four-year period of ineligibility on Andrew Iannone
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has announced its decision in the appeal arbitration procedures between the Italian MotoGP rider Andrea Iannone, the World AntiDoping Agency (WADA) and the Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme (FIM). Andrea Iannone and WADA filed separate appeals at CAS against the decision rendered by the FIM International Disciplinary Court dated 31 March 2020 in which Andrea Iannone was found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation (ADRV) (presence of Drostanolone, a anabolic steroid featured on the 2019 WADA Prohibited List) and an 18-month period of ineligibility was imposed on him.
The WS Sports Law Conference