Betting In Football: Lessons From Non-League Player’s 11 Year Suspension (The FA v Kynan Isaac)
The recent decision of the FA Independent Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) in The FA v Kynan Isaac attracted widespread media coverage owing to the length of the 11-and-a-half-year suspension handed down to the non-league football player who plays for Stratford Town FC. In addition to the length of the suspension (which is one of the longest handed down by a Regulatory Commission to a player), the decision is significant as it demonstrates the FA’s approach to circumstantial evidence in the context of match-fixing and gambling offences and illustrates the importance of players co-operating with the FA’s investigations.
This article will consider Isaac’s charges as well as the reasons given by the Commission and also a number of key learning points for players to help avoid falling foul of the FA rules concerning betting and match fixing.
The decision is available here.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Clarifying The FA’s prohibition on betting activities: an analysis of the Nick Bunyard decision
- Betting in football – Was The FA’s decision on Joey Barton a fair one?
- Betting On Inside Information In Football: Lessons from the Trippier and Sturridge cases
- A Data Analysis Of Outcomes In FA Betting Cases
- What should sports brands consider when running prize draws to boost fan engagement?
- Betting Errors – Paddy Power Case Highlights Importance Of Fair Exclusion Clauses
Phil is a Senior Associate at Mills & Reeve specialising in sports litigation and sports regulatory matters, with a particular focus on the football industry. Phil has worked on a number of high profile integrity/match fixing and doping cases across a variety of sports and also regularly advises football clubs, agents and players on transfers, most notably where work permits are required.
Harry is a trainee solicitor at Mills & Reeve based in the firm’s Birmingham office. Harry has worked on a number of sports law matters, ranging from anti-doping cases to work permit applications for professional footballers. Before starting at Mills & Reeve, Harry studied jurisprudence at the University of Oxford.