• Home
  • Topics
  • News
  • Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario does not strike out Cleveland Indians’ logo complaint

Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario does not strike out Cleveland Indians’ logo complaint

Baseball in glove

27 June 2017

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario will go ahead and hear the complaint against the Cleveland Indians over their controversial team name and logo, Chief Wahoo. Tribunal Adjudicator Jo-Anne Pickel will not defer the case brought by Douglas Cardinal in October 2016. The case is also progressing through the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Pickel will not defer to the CHRC since the Tribunal is further along in the process. The advanced stage of the litigation in the Tribunal would make it inappropriate for Pickel to defer to the federal Commission. The Commission is still considering if there is even jurisdiction for the Commission to take up the claim. While Pickel is concerned about an inconsistent application of law if both the Tribunal and Commission proceed concurrently, she was not willing to oblige Cleveland’s request for the Tribunal to defer. Instead, Pickel suggests the Commission should defer to the Tribunal since they are still in the infancy stages.

In late May, the Cleveland Indians and MLB argued the Humans Rights Tribunal lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Their argument was the issue should be brought under Canada’s Trademark Act and not human rights legislation. Pickel also rejected that argument. The Tribunal ruled Cardinal was bringing the suit in response to the specific context of the logo and the logo being cultural appropriation. Pickel held that following Cleveland’s reasoning an employee would have to bring a trademark suit against their employer if the employer posted an offensive image in the workplace.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Courses

Legal Advisors


Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2021. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.