Sports Betting in the United States: Supreme Court begins hearing Christie v. NCAAJohn Wolohan
On Monday, December 4, 2017 the United States Supreme Court began hearing legal arguments in Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) concerning New Jersey’s attempt to change its laws to permit gambling on professional and college sport events in Atlantic City casinos and at the state’s horse racing tracks.
In opposing New Jersey’s new law, the NCAA, MLB, NBA, NFL, and the NHL argued the law not only violates the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA)2 but also threaten the integrity of their sports.3
Accordingly, this article examines:
The case’s background and main arguments;
Its potential impact on sports betting in the United States.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Betting | Gambling | Major League Baseball (MLB) | National Basketball League (NBL) | National Collegiate Association (NCAA) | National Football League (NFL) | National Hockey League (NHL) | Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) | United States of America (USA)
- US sports betting: why statutory interpretation may be key to New Jersey’s efforts to legalize gambling
- U.S. sports betting: is the Professional & Amateur Sports Protection Act still fit for purpose?
- The integrity framework that can save the ‘Game Act’ & U.S. sports betting legalization - Episode 47
John Wolohan is an Attorney and Professor of Sports Law in the Syracuse University Sport Management program and an Adjunct Professor in the Syracuse University College of Law. In addition to being one of the lead editors of the book "Law for Recreation and Sport Managers" by Cotten and Wolohan, John has been teaching and working in the fields of doping, antitrust, gaming law, and sports media rights for over 25 years.