How MLS’ single entity status works and its relationship with antitrust law
Published 06 March 2017 By: Terry Brennan
In most cases, signing a player on the international soccer market is straightforward. Clubs express interest in a player. They make offers. The player accepts the offer he likes best.
But for teams in Major League Soccer (MLS), it is never that simple.
MLS controls player acquisitions through an odd set of rules designed to prevent its teams from competing against each other for available players. The rules attempt to eliminate competition by granting teams exclusive rights to negotiate with and sign certain players. While these rights can be traded or sold, for any given player, they must remain exclusive. So teams cannot bid against each other for a player and, technically, a player cannot choose between offers from multiple MLS teams. In other words, MLS acquisition rules upend the straightforward process through which players are typically signed.
So why has MLS chosen these rules over the traditional transfer market? In the author’s opinion, the answer lies in its desire to attract better players while also protecting itself from liability under United States antitrust laws. Specifically, the league wants to preserve its “single entity” defense. This comes from Section 1 of the U.S. Sherman Antitrust Act, which has been interpreted to mean that parties cannot engage in a “conspiracy” to restrain trade if they are part of a single entity. As a result, MLS structures itself as a single entity, where the league owns all of the teams and signs all of the players. Allowing teams to bid against each other for players might water down this single entity structure and make employing the defense more difficult. Hence, while the acquisition rules may seem confusing and unnecessary, they are crucial to MLS’ legal strategy.
This article explains the MLS’s single entity structure and how its player acquisition rules operate within the single entity framework. It then examines whether the single entity structure offers a sustainable defense to the provisions of the US Sherman Antitrust Act. Specifically it looks at:
- MLS’ “single entity” structure;
- MLS’ player acquisition rules;
- Discovery process;
- Acquisition process;
- Discovery process;
- Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the “single-entity” defense – a look at the relevant case law to date;
- Comment: the impact of case law on MLS’ single entity structure.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Trust | Competition Law | Contract Law | FIFA | Football | Major League Soccer (MLS) | Player Contracts | Player Transfers | United States of America (USA)
- Interview with Dimitrios Efstathiou, Vice President, Legal at Major League Soccer - Episode 31
- MLS’s CBA negotiations: federal mediation, salary cap and steps toward free agency
- Key sports law cases and developments to watch in 2017 - USA
- The key American sports law cases in 2016
Terry Brennan is a commercial litigator at Goldstein & McClintock in Chicago. He has experience across a broad range of subjects, including financial regulation, corporate fraud, sports, commercial real estate, breach of fiduciary duty, and contract disputes.
Prior to joining Goldstein & McClintock, Mr. Brennan worked at Kirkland & Ellis' Chicago office. He has a bachelor’s degree in political science from Duke University and a law degree from Northwestern University School of Law.