How Public Procurement Law Applies To Sports Governing Bodies: The CJEU's Ruling On The Italian Football Federation
We’ve known for a while now that competition law applies to sports governing bodies. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recently clarified that sports organisations can also be subject to public procurement law (i.e. the rules and processes to be followed when public authorities purchase work, goods and services from companies).
The question at the core of the CJEU’s preliminary ruling was whether national sports federations can be considered ‘public bodies’ for the purpose of EU public procurement law and thus be subject to enhanced transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality rules when organising tenders. The answer is yes, provided certain other criteria are met. In its judgment, the CJEU focussed on the legal nature of sports federations and the way in which their activities are supervised, while the legal form of a federation was considered irrelevant.
This article examines the case, looking at:
- Background facts;
- Definition of ‘bodies governed by public law’ under the Public Procurement Directive;
- Judgment of the CJEU:
- Qu 1: do sports federations “meet needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character”?
- Qu 2: what does “subject to the management supervision of a [body governed by public law] " mean?
- Analysis and comment
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Competition Law | CONI | Court Of Justice of European Union | FIGC | Football | Italy | Public Procurement Law | Regulation & Governance | Sports
- Competition authorities raise the umpire’s finger against the BCCI
- How public law principles balance the power of sports governing bodies
- The BCCI and public transparency – A review of the Law Commission Report on the applicability of the Right to Information Act
- A Guide To How 'State Aid' Law Impacts European Sports Organisations
Sînziana is a Managing Associate in Linklaters’ Competition practice. She has advised on the Single Resolution Mechanism and has extensive litigation experience before the Courts of the European Union. Sînziana is one of the global co-heads of the Linklaters’ sports sector.
Matilde is an associate in the Antitrust & Foreign Investment Group of Linklaters Brussels. Matilde advises on a broad range of EU competition law areas, including merger control reviews in different industries (such as the consumer goods and telecommunication sectors) and antitrust topics. She also has experience in proceedings focusing on EU law before the European Courts