The Racing Partnership Case – The Rights and Obligations Of Distributors Of Live Sports Betting Data
The Court of Appeal’s recent judgment in The Racing Partnership v Sports Information Services is essential reading for practitioners advising those who seek to exploit live sporting data as a commercial asset. Reversing the judgment of the High Court, the Court of Appeal held that Sports Information Services was liable for unlawful means conspiracy, but not for breach of confidence, in collecting and distributing key ‘race day’ data from horseracing arenas which The Racing Partnership had an exclusive contractual right to exploit.
This article examines the background to the case and the implications of the judgment for the law of breach of confidence/misuse of confidential information and unlawful means conspiracy.
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Betting | Breach of Contract | Commercial Law | Confidential Information | Confidentiality | Contract Law | Dispute Resolution | Gambling | Gambling Law | Horse Betting | Horseracing | Intellectual Property Law | Race Data | Sports
- Force India and damages for misuse of confidential information
- Cardiff City, the alleged misuse of confidential information and Premiership Disciplinary Regime, Section W
- Confidential data leaks – what are the vicarious liability risks for sports organisations?
- Fantasy Premier League: Do Footballers Have An Obligation To Protect Team News?
About the Author
Hollie is a barrister at Blackstone Chambers. She has developed a particular expertise in the legal implications of Brexit having recently acted in the Supreme Court cases of Re Scottish Continuity Bill and Miller (No.2) v Prime Minister. She has also advised numerous parties on issues arising out of the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018. Hollie also recently completed a secondment to the FCA, working within the General Counsel’s Division with a focus on the implementation of MiFID II and MiFIR.