A reference guide to the Russian doping scandal and response to the McLaren Reports
Published 27 June 2017 By: Rupert Beloff
This is an extract from the Anti-Doping chapter of the LawInSport & BASL Sports Law Yearbook 2016/17. To access or order a full copy of the Yearbook, please see here.
Doping has been a cause for concern within sport for decades. From the "state-sponsored" doping of the cold war era to the scandals surrounding Ben Johnson and Lance Armstrong. As detection methods have increased in sophistication, so have the techniques used by those who seek to gain an unfair advantage. Such issues have and continue to damage the credibility of sport as a whole.
In recent years, a new scandal surrounding doping on a widespread scale in Russia has erupted and has, as yet, shown no sign of resolution. Its impact had spread far beyond individual athletes to draw in national federations, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the 2016 Rio Olympic games. Additionally worrying instances of corruption linked to doping have been uncovered involving individuals who were formerly involved at the highest levels of the IAAF.
This chapter will confine itself, as the title suggests, to Russian doping scandal and allegations of corruption linked to it. However, it is worth noting that concerns involving other countries, such as Kenya, have also emerged during the same period, albeit on a lesser scale.
Specifically, we look at:
- The initial allegations
- The ARD documentaries: "Top-secret doping: How Russia makes its winners’’
- The appointment of the WADA Independent Commission
- Part I of the WADA Independent Commission Report
- IAAF Corruption
- Part II of the WADA Independent Commission Report
- New allegations and reaction
- Part I of the McLaren Report
- IOC and IPC Reaction to the McLaren Report and the Rio Games
- Part II of the McLaren Report
- Continued Pressure on the IAAF
- The state of play in 2017 and looking forward
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Anti-Doping | Athletics | Governance | International Olympic Committee (IOC) | Olympic Games Rio de Janeiro 2016 | Paralympic | Regulation | Russia | United Kingdom (UK) | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
- Doping in athletics - a review of the findings IAAF Ethics Commission and WADA IC Report #2
- An exclusive interview with the former Court of Appeal judge who helped expose corruption at the IAAF - Episode 34
- A recap of the WADA Independent Commission’s mandate for reporting on IAAF and ARAF
- Investigating systemic doping in sports: How independent commissions are established and run
Rupert is a tenant at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square and Kings Chambers.
He has substantial and wide ranging experience of sports litigation and advisory work including regulatory and disciplinary proceedings, anti-doping, free movement and right to play cases and contractual and sponsorship disputes.