Should we be comfortably satisfied with the standard of proof for match-fixing?
In this blog I have previously discussed the sanctions for match-fixing offences. I now intend to put the horse back before the cart and briefly examine another aspect of match-fixing cases, the standard of proof.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | cricket | match-fixing | snooker | UEFA | United Kingdom (UK)
Related Articles
- Match fixing in Bangladesh: the ICC’s biggest investigation yet
- Hill Dickinson gives expert advice on match-fixing at Scottish PFA’s National Conference
- BASL September update: sporting integrity revisited
- Realities of football match-fixing – case Finland
Written by
Kevin Carpenter
Kevin is a advisor and member of the editorial board for LawInSport, having previously acted as editor.
Kevin specialises in integrity, regulatory, governance and disciplinary matters. His expertise and knowledge has led him to be engaged by major private and public bodies, including the IOC, FIFA, the Council of Europe, INTERPOL and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), as well as making regular appearances internationally delivering presentations and commenting in the media on sports law issues.
His research and papers are published across a variety of forums, including having a blog on LawInSport.
Global Summit 2024