Does World Rugby need a new process to handle dual-nationality player release disputes? Lessons from the Shields & Samu cases

Published 30 May 2018 By: Jonathan Collins

Rugby player scoring a try

Recently, the issue of whether World Rugby (the governing body of rugby union) 1 could compel a national union to release a player to play international rugby union for the representative team of another national union appeared to be close to becoming the subject of a dispute between New Zealand Rugby (NZR) and World Rugby.

The matter was unusual as it concerned a player contracted to one national union (New Zealand), with the contractual intention of being available for international selection for New Zealand´s national team only (better known as the All Blacks), being potentially requested to be released to play international rugby union for England, despite not previously having played rugby union in England, or indeed represented the English national team.

The purpose of this article is to:

  • provide a summary of the matter;

  • review eligibility criteria for international rugby in the case of dual-qualified players; and

  • consider the possibility of such a matter arising again in the short to medium term and how any such dispute between World Rugby and a member union may be resolved.

 

Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport

Register here

Already a member?

Username or email   Password   Remember Me     Forgot Login?   Register  

Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts

 

Related Articles

Author

Jonathan Collins

Jonathan Collins

Senior Associate, PwC Legal

Jonathan is an Irish solicitor and Senior Associate at PwC Legal Luxembourg. Jonathan has represented Munster at Youth level, and is mainly interested in rugby union and football.

+352 26 48 42 35 66

  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Subscribe to our update emails