Football's greatest threat: Why technology & stakeholder collaboration are key to combating global match-fixing
Published 08 December 2017 By: Henry Goldschmidt
The integrity of football has faced significant challenges in recent years – from governance failures and alleged vote-rigging, to concerns around common ownership of clubs, third party ownership of players and so-called “financial doping” 1 (e.g. potential flouting of financial fair play regulations).
Yet one of the most far-reaching threats to maintaining honest competition in football is a scourge that often seems to go under the radar (certainly in terms of mainstream media reporting) – namely, match-fixing. Whilst FIFA/UEFA seem to be getting their respective houses in order and rules have been introduced to tackle ownership issues, match-fixing continues to blight the game with alarming regularity.
This article discusses the threats that match-fixing poses to football and how the community might best begin to tackle the problem. Specifically, it looks at:
Examples of recent match-fixing convictions and allegations from around the world;
The paradoxical role that modern technology plays in both combatting and exacerbating the problem;
What the future holds in terms of prevention and detection.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | FIFA | Football | Gambling | Governance | Match-Fixing | Regulation | The FA | UEFA
- Why sport needs a unified approach to sanctions for corruption offences
- Can suspicious betting alerts prove match fixing? The case of KS Skënderbeu v UEFA
- A guide to Germany’s new criminal law against betting fraud and match-fixing in sports
- The integrity framework that can save the ‘Game Act’ and serve as a model for U.S. sports betting legalization
Henry Goldschmidt is an associate at Morgan Sports Law, specialising in arbitration and litigation. He trained at Lawrence Graham (now Gowling WLG), qualifying into their dispute resolution team. After four years doing commercial litigation and international arbitration, he joined MSL in September 2016. Henry has particular interests in anti-doping, concussion and match-fixing.