The NHL concussion litigation – a second-class settlement?
On 12 November 2018, it was announced that the National Hockey League (NHL or League) had agreed a tentative settlement with several hundred former players who had sued the League on the basis that it had not done enough to protect them from the dangers of head trauma. In short, the lawsuit alleged that the NHL had negligently:
- failed to warn its players of the short/long-term consequences of repeated concussions and head trauma,
- failed to sufficiently care for its players after such injuries, and
- promoted gratuitous violence, precipitating those very head injuries.
Although the terms of the settlement are subject to a 75-day “opt-in” period for the individual claimants (and would also need to receive judicial approval), comparisons are already being made with the National Football League (NFL) litigation settlement.
Despite the apparent similarities, however, there are key differences between the NHL and NFL cases that have ultimately meant that – in raw economic terms – the corresponding settlements are chalk and cheese. In this article, the author will consider:
- the terms of the NHL settlement (including how and why they differ from the NFL settlement);
- who might be considered the winners and losers in the NHL settlement;
- the significance of “class-action” status in US proceedings; and
- the relevance of the NHL and NFL lawsuits should similar proceedings arise in the courts of England and Wales.
Continue reading this article...
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Athlete Welfare | Civil Procedure Rules | Concussion | Consumer Rights Act 2015 | Dispute Resolution | Employment | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | Ice Hockey | National Football League (NFL) | National Hockey League (NHL) | USA
- NHL expansion: The formation of the Vegas Golden Knights
- The new blood test for traumatic brain injury and what it may mean for athlete welfare
- Global concussion education reaches 61,000 new participants in 2017
- How the latest technological advances in diagnosing concussion could influence sports policy
About the Author
Henry Goldschmidt is an associate at Morgan Sports Law, specialising in arbitration and litigation. He trained at Lawrence Graham (now Gowling WLG), qualifying into their dispute resolution team. After four years doing commercial litigation and international arbitration, he joined MSL in September 2016. Henry has particular interests in anti-doping, concussion and match-fixing.