What are the early effects of the TPO ban in Brazil?
Published 14 August 2015 By: Mariana Rosignoli
In December 2014, FIFA sent Circular 14641 to its members, informing them that the Executive Committee had approved, effective from 1 January 2015, new rules banning the third-party ownership of players’ economic rights (“TPO”).2 The letter also set out the definition of a “third party”, and a new provision formalising the ban, to be included as Article 18bis of FIFA’s Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players.3
FIFA’s decision surprised the market, and the early effective date - 1 May 2015 - worried clubs and investors around the world, partly due to the sheer prevalence of third party arrangements. Eight months after coming into force, what effects has the ban had on the Brazilian market?
A brief background to TPO in Brazil
There are a large number of models for the participation of third parties in football clubs, but the most common is when companies or individuals provide money - invest in a club - in return for a percentage of the future transfer value of a player. The value rights in a player that are subject to temporary or permanent assignment are often referred to as "economic rights". In this way, Brazilian clubs have sought to solve their financial problems by attracting investors willing to inject their resources into the club in return for a percentage of the economic rights in their players. The attraction for investors is the potential for high returns, difficult to attain in other industries.
Get access to this article and all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport
Already a member?
Articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts
This work was written for and first published on LawInSport.com (unless otherwise stated) and the copyright is owned by LawInSport Ltd. Permission is granted to make digital or hard copies of this work (or part, or abstracts, of it) for personal use provided copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage, and provided that all copies bear this notice and full citation on the first page (which should include the URL, company name (LawInSport), article title, author name, date of the publication and date of use) of any copies made. Copyright for components of this work owned by parties other than LawInSport must be honoured.
- Tags: Brazil | FIFA | FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players | Financial Fair Play | Football | Governance | Regulation | The Brazilian confederation (CBF) | Third Party Ownership
- R.I.P. TPO: a guide to FIFA’s ban on third party ownership
- Third Party Ownership – a Brazilian perspective
- New challenges in the financing of football clubs (FFP, TPO and players funds)
- TPO: A legitimate player financing mechanism or a threat to sport integrity
Mariana is partner at S. Santos Rodrigues Lawyers, a firm based in Brazil. Mariana advises on sponsorship, image rights, employment contracts, investments, disciplinary, athletes taxation and organization (documents) of clubs, leagues and related.