Brazil’s telecom regulator investigates the status of internet (OTT) transmissions (Claro S.A. v Fox)

Brazil Streaming
Published: Monday, 11 November 2019. Written by Ana Carolina Cagnoni No Comments

Preliminary suspension of “live” channel transmissions via the Fox+ subscription app has started a fascinating legal debate in Brazil.

On June 13 this year, the Brazilian Telecommunications Agency (ANATEL) ruled that “linear” channel transmissions over the internet should be subjected to the same regulatory framework as Pay TV companies. As a result of the decision, the Fox+ subscription app was temporarily suspended. It is the first decision by ANATEL in a case brought by Claro S.A. (a Pay TV operator) who is challenging the legality of the Fox+ application in its current form of providing linear content directly to consumers.

Continue reading this article...

Register with your email and password
Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

About the Author

Ana Carolina Cagnoni

Ana Carolina Cagnoni

Partner, Grinberg Cordovil Advogados
 
Ana Carolina Cagnoni's background is in entertainment law, technology, privacy, and intellectual property law, including biodiversity matters and access to genetic resources. She has extensive practice in negotiating and drafting agreements related to IP rights and tech, and in providing legal advice for the television, cinema, sports, technology and software industries. She previously worked as an in-house lawyer for major multinational companies in Brazil. Currently IP and Tech partner at the Grinberg Cordovil Advogados, based in São Paulo.
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.

Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2020. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.